These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24859413)

  • 1. Total reproductive values for females and for males in sexual diploids are not equal.
    Grafen A
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Oct; 359():233-5. PubMed ID: 24859413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total reproductive value of juvenile females is twice that of juvenile males under X-linkage and haplodiploidy.
    Gardner A
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Oct; 359():236-7. PubMed ID: 25017725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional rare males in diploid parthenogenetic Artemia.
    Maccari M; Gómez A; Hontoria F; Amat F
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Sep; 26(9):1934-48. PubMed ID: 23837914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clonal reproduction by males and females in the little fire ant.
    Fournier D; Estoup A; Orivel J; Foucaud J; Jourdan H; Le Breton J; Keller L
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7046):1230-4. PubMed ID: 15988525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The parasite capacity of the host population].
    Kozminskiĭ EV
    Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11965643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Origin of sex for error repair. I. Sex, diploidy, and haploidy.
    Long A; Michod RE
    Theor Popul Biol; 1995 Feb; 47(1):18-55. PubMed ID: 7709368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multigenerational reproductive study of genistein (Cas No. 446-72-0) in Sprague-Dawley rats (feed study).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2008 Mar; (539):1-266. PubMed ID: 18685713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inbreeding and reproductive investment in the ant Formica exsecta.
    Vitikainen E; Haag-Liautard C; Sundström L
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2026-37. PubMed ID: 21729057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coalescent patterns in diploid exchangeable population models.
    Möhle M; Sagitov S
    J Math Biol; 2003 Oct; 47(4):337-52. PubMed ID: 14523577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different cost of reproduction for the males and females of the rare dioecious shrub Corema conradii (Empetraceae).
    Rocheleau AF; Houle G
    Am J Bot; 2001 Apr; 88(4):659-66. PubMed ID: 11302852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive value and the stochastic demography of age-structured populations.
    Engen S; Lande R; Saether BE; Dobson FS
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):795-804. PubMed ID: 19842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual and population sex allocation patterns.
    Frank SA
    Theor Popul Biol; 1987 Feb; 31(1):47-74. PubMed ID: 3563943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Geographic variation of sexual dimorphism in the moor frog (Rana arvalis) as a result of differences in reproductive strategies].
    Liapkov SM; Cherdantsev VG; Cherdantseva EM
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2010; 71(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 20865933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioural interactions selecting for symmetry and asymmetry in sexual reproductive systems of eusocial species.
    Witting L
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 May; 69(4):1167-98. PubMed ID: 17364150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive effort and costs of reproduction do not explain female-biased sex ratios in the moss Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Amblystegiaceae).
    Bisang I; Ehrlén J; Hedenäs L
    Am J Bot; 2006 Sep; 93(9):1313-9. PubMed ID: 21642196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the ratio of effective to actual size of an age-structured population from individual demographic data.
    Engen S; Lande R; Saether BE; Gienapp P
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Jun; 23(6):1148-58. PubMed ID: 20345812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haplodiploidy, sex, and the evolution of pesticide resistance.
    Carrière Y
    J Econ Entomol; 2003 Dec; 96(6):1626-40. PubMed ID: 14977097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strong gender differences in reproductive success variance, and the times to the most recent common ancestors.
    Favre M; Sornette D
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Oct; 310():43-54. PubMed ID: 22743131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary sex ratio in fertilized chicken eggs (Gallus gallus domesticus) depends on reproductive age and selection.
    Klein S; Grossmann R
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2008 Jan; 309(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 18030680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.