These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24859839)

  • 41. On the role of language membership information during word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from flanker-language congruency effects.
    Declerck M; Snell J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):704-709. PubMed ID: 28936807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 31463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Context-Specific Proportion Congruency Effects: An Episodic Learning Account and Computational Model.
    Schmidt JR
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1806. PubMed ID: 27899907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Voice congruency facilitates word recognition.
    Campeanu S; Craik FI; Alain C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58778. PubMed ID: 23527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Remembering "primed" words: A counter-intuitive effect of repetition on recognition memory.
    Rosner TM; López-Benítez R; D'Angelo MC; Thomson D; Milliken B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Mar; 72(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 29517266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects.
    Schmidt JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1496-505. PubMed ID: 27585071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Recognition-induced forgetting is caused by episodic, not semantic, memory retrieval tasks.
    Maxcey AM; McCann M; Stallkamp S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 32034720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
    Park H; Rugg MD
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The "visual word form area" is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces.
    Mei L; Xue G; Chen C; Xue F; Zhang M; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):371-8. PubMed ID: 20353828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Voices to remember: Comparing neural signatures of intentional and non-intentional voice learning and recognition.
    Humble D; Schweinberger SR; Dobel C; Zäske R
    Brain Res; 2019 May; 1711():214-225. PubMed ID: 30685271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Elaborately rehearsed information can be forgotten: A new paradigm to investigate directed forgetting.
    Gao H; Qi M; Zhang Q
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Oct; 164():107063. PubMed ID: 31376463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Learning from errors is attributable to episodic recollection rather than semantic mediation.
    Metcalfe J; Huelser BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107296. PubMed ID: 31811845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neural correlates of the production effect: An fMRI study.
    Bailey LM; Bodner GE; Matheson HE; Stewart BM; Roddick K; O'Neil K; Simmons M; Lambert AM; Krigolson OE; Newman AJ; Fawcett JM
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Aug; 152():105757. PubMed ID: 34130081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding?
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23244053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of headache pain on attention (encoding) and memory (recognition).
    Kuhajda MC; Thorn BE; Klinger MR; Rubin NJ
    Pain; 2002 Jun; 97(3):213-221. PubMed ID: 12044618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of attention and semantic relation on event-related potentials in a picture-word naming task.
    Greenham SL; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Biol Psychol; 2000 Dec; 55(2):79-104. PubMed ID: 11118677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25398560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.