226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24860932)
1. A comparison of the patient and surgeon opinion on the long-term aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty: have we improved over 15 years?
Godwin Y; Barron EJ; Edmunds MC; Meyer M; Bardsley A; Logan AM; O'Neill TJ; Wood SH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Jul; 67(7):932-8. PubMed ID: 24860932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the patient and surgeon opinion on the long-term aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty.
Godwin Y; Wood SH; O'Neill TJ
Br J Plast Surg; 1998 Sep; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 9849364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current trends in breast reduction.
Roje Z; Roje Z; Milosević M; Varvodić J; Mance M
Coll Antropol; 2012 Jun; 36(2):657-68. PubMed ID: 22856260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aesthetic refinements and reoperative procedures following 370 consecutive DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstructions: important considerations for patient consent.
Enajat M; Smit JM; Rozen WM; Hartman EH; Liss A; Kildal M; Audolfsson T; Acosta R
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 20424838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences between patients and medical professionals in the evaluation of aesthetic outcome following breast reconstruction with implants.
Wachter T; Edlinger M; Foerg C; Djedovic G; Mayerl C; Kinzl J; Bauer T; Wolfram D
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Aug; 67(8):1111-7. PubMed ID: 24857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants.
Gahm J; Jurell G; Edsander-Nord A; Wickman M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 19071075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation.
Yueh JH; Houlihan MJ; Slavin SA; Lee BT; Pories SE; Morris DJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 19387167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome study: periareolar mammaplasty patients' perspective.
Fayman MS; Potgieter E; Becker PJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Feb; 111(2):676-84; discussion 685-7. PubMed ID: 12560688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transgender patient satisfaction following reduction mammaplasty.
Nelson L; Whallett EJ; McGregor JC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Mar; 62(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 18083643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study.
Hosnuter M; Tosun Z; Kargi E; Babuccu O; Savaci N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 16328641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vertical scar versus the inverted-T scar reduction mammaplasty: a 10-year follow-up.
Bouwer LR; van der Biezen JJ; Spronk CA; van der Lei B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1298-304. PubMed ID: 22658727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of reduction mammaplasty--a patients' perspective.
Brown AP; Hill C; Khan K
Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Oct; 53(7):584-7. PubMed ID: 11000075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An audit of outcome including patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction performed by breast surgeons.
Berry MG; al-Mufti RA; Jenkinson AD; Denton S; Sullivan M; Vaus A; Carpenter R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 May; 80(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 9682638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approaching revisional surgery in augmentation and mastopexy/augmentation patients.
Dickinson BP; Handel N
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jan; 68(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 21587043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term satisfaction of reduction mammaplasty for bilateral symptomatic macromastia in younger patients.
Nguyen JT; Palladino H; Sonnema AJ; Petty PM
J Adolesc Health; 2013 Jul; 53(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 23523309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aesthetic quality of the nipple-areola complex in breast reconstruction with a new local graft technique.
Costa MP; Ferreira MC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):774-9. PubMed ID: 19597864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue expansion after inverted-T mammaplasty: can it be performed successfully?
Kilgo MS; Cordeiro PG; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Jun; 50(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 12783005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recurrent mammary hyperplasia: current concepts.
Rohrich RJ; Thornton JF; Sorokin ES
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):387-93; quiz 394. PubMed ID: 12496611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR), improving outcome without oncological compromise.
Mosahebi A; Ramakrishnan V; Gittos M; Collier DS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(10):1025-30. PubMed ID: 16996423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
