175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24861176)
1. [Priority setting for the health technology assessment].
Poblete-Vargas S; Castillo-Laborde C
Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142 Suppl 1():S22-6. PubMed ID: 24861176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model for HTA priority setting: experience in Lithuania.
Jankauskiene D; Petronyte G
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Oct; 29(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 24290339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches.
Noorani HZ; Husereau DR; Boudreau R; Skidmore B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 17579932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH.
Husereau D; Boucher M; Noorani H
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jul; 26(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 20584365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutionalizing health technology assessment for priority setting and health policy in Latin America: from regional endeavors to national experiences.
Augustovski F; Alcaraz A; Caporale J; García Martí S; Pichon Riviere A
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Feb; 15(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 25420744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introducing health technology assessment in Tanzania.
Surgey G; Chalkidou K; Reuben W; Suleman F; Miot J; Hofman K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Apr; 36(2):80-86. PubMed ID: 31402790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR DECISION MAKING IN LATIN AMERICA: GOOD PRACTICE PRINCIPLES.
Pichon-Riviere A; Soto NC; Augustovski FA; García Martí S; Sampietro-Colom L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 29888696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification and priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: actors and activities.
Oortwijn W; Banta D; Vondeling H; Bouter L
Health Policy; 1999 Jun; 47(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 10538921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Austria: history of health technology assessment during the past 20 years.
Wild C
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():74-81. PubMed ID: 19500437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A decade to the Israeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care.
Tamir O; Shemer J; Shani M; Vaknin S; Siebzehner MI
Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Dec; 10(12):901-5. PubMed ID: 19160954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Priority setting for horizon scanning of new health technologies in Denmark: views of health care stakeholders and health economists.
Douw K; Vondeling H; Oortwijn W
Health Policy; 2006 May; 76(3):334-45. PubMed ID: 16081185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands.
Stolk EA; de Bont A; van Halteren AR; Bijlmer RJ; Poley MJ
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19371181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutionalizing Evidence-Informed Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: Lessons From Indonesia.
Sharma M; Teerawattananon Y; Luz A; Li R; Rattanavipapong W; Dabak S
Inquiry; 2020; 57():46958020924920. PubMed ID: 32513029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to choose health technologies to be assessed by HTA? A review of criteria for priority setting.
Specchia ML; Favale M; Di Nardo F; Rotundo G; Favaretti C; Ricciardi W; de Waure C;
Epidemiol Prev; 2015; 39(4 Suppl 1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26499414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods, procedures, and contextual characteristics of health technology assessment and health policy decision making: comparison of health technology assessment agencies in Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Sweden.
Schwarzer R; Siebert U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 19619349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing external risks to health technology assessment programs.
Hailey D; Juzwishin D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 16984675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN LATIN AMERICA.
Pichon-Riviere A; Soto N; Augustovski F; Sampietro-Colom L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 29888698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward.
Baltussen R; Marsh K; Thokala P; Diaby V; Castro H; Cleemput I; Garau M; Iskrov G; Olyaeemanesh A; Mirelman A; Mobinizadeh M; Morton A; Tringali M; van Til J; Valentim J; Wagner M; Youngkong S; Zah V; Toll A; Jansen M; Bijlmakers L; Oortwijn W; Broekhuizen H
Value Health; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1283-1288. PubMed ID: 31708065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
