BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24861649)

  • 1. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
    Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
    Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges.
    Dreyer K; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25682307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
    Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Algorithm of Transvaginal Ultrasound and/or Hysterosalpingogram for Confirmation Testing at 3 Months after Essure Placement.
    Vleugels M; Cheng RF; Goldstein J; Bangerter K; Connor V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1128-1135. PubMed ID: 28669895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
    Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Diamond MP; Kmak DC; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 18588851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast infusion sonography in the post-Essure setting.
    Connor V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18262145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Essure insert expulsion after 3-month hysterosalpingogram confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion and bilateral correct placement: case report.
    Garcia AL; Lewis RM; Sloan AL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 23312251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
    Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
    Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
    Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine fluid instillation to confirm tubal occlusion after transcervical permanent contraception: A pilot study
    Patil E; Thurmond A; Hart K; Seguin J; Edelman A; Jensen JT
    Contraception; 2020 Jan; 101(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 31655066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: results of the first Essure pbc clinical study.
    Kerin JF; Carignan CS; Cher D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 11787907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
    Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study.
    Chudnoff SG; Nichols JE; Levie M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):951-60. PubMed ID: 25917278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
    Connor VF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.