192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24861820)
1. Psychosocial assessment of candidates and risk classification of patients considered for durable mechanical circulatory support.
Maltby MC; Flattery MP; Burns B; Salyer J; Weinland S; Shah KB
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2014 Aug; 33(8):836-41. PubMed ID: 24861820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.
Halkar M; Nowacki AS; Kendall K; Efeovbokhan N; Gorodeski EZ; Moazami N; Starling RC; Young JB; Lee S; Tang WHW
Prog Transplant; 2018 Sep; 28(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 29879864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychosocial Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Using the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale.
Yost GL; Bhat G; Ibrahim KN; Karountzos AG; Chandrasekaran M; Mahoney E
Psychosomatics; 2016; 57(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 26481959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Right heart failure and "failure to thrive" after left ventricular assist device: clinical predictors and outcomes.
Baumwol J; Macdonald PS; Keogh AM; Kotlyar E; Spratt P; Jansz P; Hayward CS
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Aug; 30(8):888-95. PubMed ID: 21530314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caregivers of Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Possible Impacts on Patients' Mortality and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-Defined Morbidity Events.
Bruce CR; Minard CG; Wilhelms LA; Abraham M; Amione-Guerra J; Pham L; Grogan SD; Trachtenberg B; Smith ML; Bruckner BA; Estep JD; Kostick KM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 28073849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation: A Cohort Study of its Association With Survival Among Lung Transplant Recipients.
Hitschfeld MJ; Schneekloth TD; Kennedy CC; Rummans TA; Niazi SK; Vasquez AR; Geske JR; Petterson TM; Kremers WK; Jowsey-Gregoire SG
Psychosomatics; 2016; 57(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 27494985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized Psychosocial Assessment Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.
Sperry BW; Ikram A; Alvarez PA; Perez AL; Kendall K; Gorodeski EZ; Starling RC
Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e005377. PubMed ID: 30621509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?
Sabashnikov A; Popov AF; Bowles CT; Mohite PN; Weymann A; Hards R; Hedger M; Wittwer T; Wippermann J; Wahlers T; Schoendube FA; Simon AR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):1115-21; discussion 1021-2. PubMed ID: 25129605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of APACHE II scores to select candidates for left ventricular assist device placement. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation.
Gracin N; Johnson MR; Spokas D; Allen J; Bartlett L; Piccione W; Parrillo JE; Costanzo MR; Calvin JE
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1998 Oct; 17(10):1017-23. PubMed ID: 9811411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unplanned hospital readmissions after HeartMate II implantation: frequency, risk factors, and impact on resource use and survival.
Smedira NG; Hoercher KJ; Lima B; Mountis MM; Starling RC; Thuita L; Schmuhl DM; Blackstone EH
JACC Heart Fail; 2013 Feb; 1(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24621797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Left ventricular assist device destination therapy versus extended criteria cardiac transplant.
Daneshmand MA; Rajagopal K; Lima B; Khorram N; Blue LJ; Lodge AJ; Hernandez AF; Rogers JG; Milano CA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 89(4):1205-9; discussion 1210. PubMed ID: 20338335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplant candidacy.
Elhenawy AM; Algarni KD; Rodger M; Maciver J; Maganti M; Cusimano RJ; Yau TM; Delgado DH; Ross HJ; Rao V
J Card Surg; 2011 Sep; 26(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 21883463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical and psychosocial predictors of mechanical circulatory support device implantation and competing outcomes in the Waiting for a New Heart Study.
Spaderna H; Weidner G; Koch KC; Kaczmarek I; Wagner FM; Smits JM;
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jan; 31(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 21959123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of life and emotional distress early after left ventricular assist device implant: a mixed-method study.
Modica M; Ferratini M; Torri A; Oliva F; Martinelli L; De Maria R; Frigerio M
Artif Organs; 2015 Mar; 39(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 25205291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized Use of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation in LVAD Patients.
Cagliostro M; Bromley A; Ting P; Donehey J; Ferket B; Parks K; Palumbo E; Mancini D; Anyanwu A; Pawale A; Pinney S; Moss N; Lala A
J Card Fail; 2019 Sep; 25(9):735-743. PubMed ID: 31220624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival after biventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.
Cleveland JC; Naftel DC; Reece TB; Murray M; Antaki J; Pagani FD; Kirklin JK
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Aug; 30(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 21621423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implantable left ventricular assist device. Approaching an alternative for end-stage heart failure. Implantable LVAD Study Group.
McCarthy PM; James KB; Savage RM; Vargo R; Kendall K; Harasaki H; Hobbs RE; Pashkow FJ
Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5 Pt 2):II83-6. PubMed ID: 7955290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chronic mechanical circulatory support for inotrope-dependent heart failure patients who are not transplant candidates: results of the INTrEPID Trial.
Rogers JG; Butler J; Lansman SL; Gass A; Portner PM; Pasque MK; Pierson RN;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(8):741-7. PubMed ID: 17707178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.
Lietz K; Long JW; Kfoury AG; Slaughter MS; Silver MA; Milano CA; Rogers JG; Naka Y; Mancini D; Miller LW
Circulation; 2007 Jul; 116(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 17638928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
