BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24862702)

  • 1. Clinical efficacy of electronic apex locators: systematic review.
    Martins JN; Marques D; Mata A; Caramês J
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):759-77. PubMed ID: 24862702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo comparison of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.
    Silveira LF; Petry FV; Martos J; Neto JB
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 21771186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of two electronic apex locators in a dental student clinic.
    Himel VT; Cain C
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):803-6. PubMed ID: 20830894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kara Tuncer A; Gerek M
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 24331988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic apex locators may be better at determining endodontic working length than radiographs and could reduce patient radiation exposure.
    Chandler N
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 15(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 25666578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of electronic apex locators may improve determination of working length.
    Mello I
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):120. PubMed ID: 25522947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Electronic determination of the length of the root canal].
    Dehon P; Van Nieuwenhuysen JP
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1999; 54(4):259-81. PubMed ID: 12723167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: an in vitro comparison of 5 brands.
    Akisue E; Gratieri SD; Barletta FB; Caldeira CL; Grazziotin-Soares R; Gavini G
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 24332000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen.
    Stoll R; Urban-Klein B; Roggendorf MJ; Jablonski-Momeni A; Strauch K; Frankenberger R
    Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):808-17. PubMed ID: 20796049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator, and RomiAPEX D-30.
    Bernardes RA; Duarte MA; Vasconcelos BC; Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB; Baldi JV; Victorino FR; Bramante CM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e91-4. PubMed ID: 17703968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of working length determination using 3 electronic apex locators and direct digital radiography.
    Real DG; Davidowicz H; Moura-Netto C; Zenkner Cde L; Pagliarin CM; Barletta FB; de Moura AA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Mar; 111(3):e44-9. PubMed ID: 21310349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of electronic working length determination.
    Hoer D; Attin T
    Int Endod J; 2004 Feb; 37(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 14871179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic apex locators.
    Gordon MP; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):425-37. PubMed ID: 15189431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparative study of conventional radiography and Root ZX apex locator in determining root canal working length.
    Javidi M; Moradi S; Rashed R; Raziee L
    N Y State Dent J; 2009; 75(4):48-51. PubMed ID: 19722483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vivo comparison of working length determination of two frequency-based electronic apex locators.
    Pascon EA; Marrelli M; Congi O; Ciancio R; Miceli F; Versiani MA
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19825037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic apex locator.
    Kim E; Lee SJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 48(1):35-54. PubMed ID: 15066506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vivo evaluation of different methods of working length determination.
    Mandlik J; Shah N; Pawar K; Gupta P; Singh S; Shaik SA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 24309342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.