1445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24862716)
1. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 24460041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of WaveOne nickel-titanium instruments.
Saber Sel D; Abu El Sadat SM
J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):685-8. PubMed ID: 23611391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems.
Marzouk AM; Ghoneim AG
J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):906-9. PubMed ID: 23791261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Canal Transportation, Centering Ratio by Cone-beam Computed Tomography after Preparation with Different File Systems.
Uzunoglu E; Turker SA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 26162254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
Liu W; Wu B
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 27054859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
