1446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24862716)
21. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems.
Versiani MA; Leoni GB; Steier L; De-Deus G; Tassani S; Pécora JD; de Sousa-Neto MD
J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23880278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Micro-Computed Tomography Study of Filling Material Removal from Oval-shaped Canals by Using Rotary, Reciprocating, and Adaptive Motion Systems.
Crozeta BM; Silva-Sousa YT; Leoni GB; Mazzi-Chaves JF; Fantinato T; Baratto-Filho F; Sousa-Neto MD
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):793-7. PubMed ID: 26987688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis.
Fruchi Lde C; Ordinola-Zapata R; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Bueno CE; De Martin AS
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1000-4. PubMed ID: 24935552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal.
Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of 2 Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Shaping Root Canals.
da Silva Limoeiro AG; Dos Santos AH; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Fontana CE; Gavini G; Freire LG; da Silveira Bueno CE
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):496-9. PubMed ID: 26776939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment.
Özyürek T; Demiryürek EÖ
J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):646-9. PubMed ID: 26898565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system.
Liu R; Hou BX; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1054-6. PubMed ID: 23880276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography.
Hwang YH; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Lee W; Shon WJ; Chang SW
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1186-9. PubMed ID: 25069930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
Özer SY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
