These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24862796)

  • 1. Interspecies differences in reaction to a biodegradable subcutaneous tissue filler: severe inflammatory granulomatous reaction in the Sinclair minipig.
    Ramot Y; Touitou D; Levin G; Ickowicz DE; Zada MH; Abbas R; Yankelson L; Domb AJ; Nyska A
    Toxicol Pathol; 2015 Feb; 43(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 24862796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biocompatibility of two novel dermal fillers: histological evaluation of implants of a hyaluronic acid filler and a polyacrylamide filler.
    Fernández-Cossío S; Castaño-Oreja MT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1789-96. PubMed ID: 16651952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatibility and safety evaluation of a ricinoleic acid-based poly(ester-anhydride) copolymer after implantation in rats.
    Vaisman B; Motiei M; Nyska A; Domb AJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Feb; 92(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 19191319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
    Zywicka B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calcium hydroxylapatite filler: an overview of safety and tolerability.
    Pavicic T
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2013 Sep; 12(9):996-1002. PubMed ID: 24002146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse reactions to injectable soft tissue fillers.
    Requena L; Requena C; Christensen L; Zimmermann US; Kutzner H; Cerroni L
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):1-34; quiz 35-6. PubMed ID: 21167403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk profiles of different injectable fillers: results from the Injectable Filler Safety Study (IFS Study).
    Zielke H; Wölber L; Wiest L; Rzany B
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):326-35; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 18177399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term Local and Systemic Safety of Poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) after Subcutaneous and Intra-articular Implantation in Rats.
    Ramot Y; Nyska A; Markovitz E; Dekel A; Klaiman G; Zada MH; Domb AJ; Maronpot RR
    Toxicol Pathol; 2015 Dec; 43(8):1127-40. PubMed ID: 26296630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biocompatibility comparison of novel soft tissue implants vs commonly used biomaterials in a pig model.
    Kolb CM; Pierce LM; Roofe SB
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22687327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of biodegradable synthetic scaffold coated on arterial prostheses implanted in rat subcutaneous tissue.
    Wang Z; Wang S; Marois Y; Guidoin R; Zhang Z
    Biomaterials; 2005 Dec; 26(35):7387-401. PubMed ID: 16019065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a small animal model for soft tissue filler characterization.
    Hillel AT; Nahas Z; Unterman S; Reid B; Axelman J; Sutton D; Matheson C; Petsche J; Elisseeff JH
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 22335613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological evaluation of different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes implanted subcutaneously in rats.
    Zhao S; Pinholt EM; Madsen JE; Donath K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 28(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 10958425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of fibrous tissue formation surrounding intraperitoneal and subcutaneous implantation of ALCAP, HA, and TCP ceramic devices.
    Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Tucci M; Cason Z
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():18-23. PubMed ID: 9603006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to a mineral trioxide aggregate-based and a zinc oxide and eugenol sealer.
    Zmener O; Martinez Lalis R; Pameijer CH; Chaves C; Kokubu G; Grana D
    J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1233-8. PubMed ID: 22892741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of decellularized xenogenic porcine auricular cartilage as a novel biocompatible filler.
    Shin SC; Park HY; Shin N; Jung DW; Kwon HK; Kim JM; Wang SG; Lee JC; Sung ES; Park GC; Lee BJ
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2018 Oct; 106(7):2708-2715. PubMed ID: 29427545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interspecies Comparison of Control Data From Embryo-Fetal Development Studies in Sprague-Dawley Rats, New Zealand White Rabbits, and Göttingen Minipigs.
    Paradis FH; Downey AM; Beaudry F; Pinêtre C; Ellemann-Laursen S; Makin A; Hill K; Singh P; Hargitai J; Forster R; Tavcar R; Authier S
    Int J Toxicol; 2019; 38(6):476-486. PubMed ID: 31470750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biocompatibility of different poly(lactide-coglycolide) polymers implanted into the subconjunctival space in rats.
    Rönkkö S; Kaarniranta K; Kalesnykas G; Uusitalo H
    Ophthalmic Res; 2011; 46(2):55-65. PubMed ID: 21228610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the Host Reaction to CorMatrix and Different Cardiac Patch Materials Implanted Subcutaneously in Growing Pigs.
    Mosala Nezhad Z; Poncelet A; Fervaille C; Gianello P
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 67(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29078233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Granulomatous reaction after injection of a new resorbable filler Novabel.
    Moulonguet I; de Goursac C; Plantier F
    Am J Dermatopathol; 2011 Oct; 33(7):710-1. PubMed ID: 21946760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biocompatibility and Immunophenotypic Characterization of a Porcine Cholecyst-derived Scaffold Implanted in Rats.
    Muhamed J; Revi D; Rajan A; Geetha S; Anilkumar TV
    Toxicol Pathol; 2015 Jun; 43(4):536-45. PubMed ID: 25318959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.