BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24863013)

  • 1. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
    Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
    Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
    BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
    Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiparametric MRI Improves Accuracy of Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
    Feng TS; Sharif-Afshar AR; Wu J; Li Q; Luthringer D; Saouaf R; Kim HL
    Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 26194289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
    Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adding multiparametric MRI to the MSKCC and Partin nomograms for primary prostate cancer: Improving local tumor staging?
    Jansen BHE; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Oprea-Lager DE; Yska MJ; Lont AP; van Moorselaar RJA; Vis AN
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e1-181.e6. PubMed ID: 30558983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables.
    Augustin H; Fritz GA; Ehammer T; Auprich M; Pummer K
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 19455449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate MRI added to CAPRA, MSKCC and Partin cancer nomograms significantly enhances the prediction of adverse findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Sandeman K; Eineluoto JT; Pohjonen J; Erickson A; Kilpeläinen TP; Järvinen P; Santti H; Petas A; Matikainen M; Marjasuo S; Kenttämies A; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235779. PubMed ID: 32645056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
    Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
    J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Incremental Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Staging before Radical Prostatectomy.
    Morlacco A; Sharma V; Viers BR; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Froemming AT; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):701-704. PubMed ID: 27576750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Lee H; Kim CK; Park BK; Sung HH; Han DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
    World J Urol; 2017 Jun; 35(6):929-934. PubMed ID: 27738805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
    Wang L; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Schwartz LH; Eberhardt SC; Chen HN; Scardino PT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16498101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparative analysis of the accuracy of HistoScanning and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the localization of prostate cancer among men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Orczyk C; Rosenkrantz AB; Deng FM; Melamed J; Babb J; Wysock J; Kheterpal E; Huang WC; Stifelman M; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Urol Oncol; 2016 Jan; 34(1):3.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26338414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and internal validation of a side-specific, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
    Martini A; Gupta A; Lewis SC; Cumarasamy S; Haines KG; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Tewari AK
    BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 29676063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Diamand R; Ploussard G; Roumiguié M; Oderda M; Benamran D; Fiard G; Quackels T; Assenmacher G; Simone G; Van Damme J; Malavaud B; Iselin C; Descotes JL; Roche JB; Peltier A; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S
    Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):180-185. PubMed ID: 33023770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.