195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24863133)
1. The Sharvard Corpus: a phonemically-balanced Spanish sentence resource for audiology.
Aubanel V; Lecumberri ML; Cooke M
Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):633-8. PubMed ID: 24863133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.
Tóth MA; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL184-9. PubMed ID: 25698048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of the Dutch matrix test by random selection of sentences from a preselected subset.
Houben R; Dreschler WA
Trends Hear; 2015 May; 19():. PubMed ID: 25964195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review.
Kollmeier B; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Zokoll MA; Uslar V; Brand T; Wagener KC
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():3-16. PubMed ID: 26383182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.
Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English.
Kelly H; Lin G; Sankaran N; Xia J; Kalluri S; Carlile S
Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 27758153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
