105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24863265)
1. MOSAIC_SSD: a new web tool for species sensitivity distribution to include censored data by maximum likelihood.
Kon Kam King G; Veber P; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Sep; 33(9):2133-9. PubMed ID: 24863265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MOSAIC: a web-interface for statistical analyses in ecotoxicology.
Charles S; Veber P; Delignette-Muller ML
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(12):11295-11302. PubMed ID: 28842838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Species sensitivity distribution evaluation for chronic nickel toxicity to marine organisms.
DeForest DK; Schlekat CE
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 23553986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.
Grist EP; Leung KM; Wheeler JR; Crane M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 12109754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.
Sorgog K; Kamo M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109494. PubMed ID: 31376805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
Hickey GL; Craig PS
Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hierarchical modelling of species sensitivity distribution: development and application to the case of diatoms exposed to several herbicides.
Kon Kam King G; Larras F; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Apr; 114():212-21. PubMed ID: 25656423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to account for the uncertainty from standard toxicity tests in species sensitivity distributions: An example in non-target plants.
Charles S; Wu D; Ducrot V
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245071. PubMed ID: 33411834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Species sensitivity distribution for chlorpyrifos to aquatic organisms: Model choice and sample size.
Zhao J; Chen B
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Mar; 125():161-9. PubMed ID: 26701839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the mode of the hazard function.
Mazucheli J; Barros EA; Achcar JA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Jul; 79(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 15955591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-dependent species sensitivity distributions.
Fox DR; Billoir E
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 23161611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of aquatic toxicity benchmarks for oil products using species sensitivity distributions.
Barron MG; Hemmer MJ; Jackson CR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 23554001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for air toxic emission inventories with censored emission factor data.
Frey HC; Zhao Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(22):6094-100. PubMed ID: 15573612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
