These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24863265)

  • 41. Summing nondetects: incorporating low-level contaminants in risk assessment.
    Helsel DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 20821699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selection bias correction for species sensitivity distribution modeling and hazardous concentration estimation.
    Fox DR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2555-63. PubMed ID: 26053359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Time is of the essence.
    Heckmann LH; Baas J; Jager T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Jun; 29(6):1396-8. PubMed ID: 20821584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. SLDAssay: A software package and web tool for analyzing limiting dilution assays.
    Trumble IM; Allmon AG; Archin NM; Rigdon J; Francis O; Baldoni PL; Hudgens MG
    J Immunol Methods; 2017 Nov; 450():10-16. PubMed ID: 28733216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ecotoxicology and macroecology--time for integration.
    Beketov MA; Liess M
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Mar; 162():247-54. PubMed ID: 22243871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bad habits die hard: the NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology.
    Jager T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Feb; 31(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 22095471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ecotoxicity and chemical sediment data classification by the use of self-organising maps.
    Tsakovski S; Kudlak B; Simeonov V; Wolska L; Namiesnik J
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Jan; 631(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 19084619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development and application of a species sensitivity distribution for temperature-induced mortality in the aquatic environment.
    de Vries P; Tamis JE; Murk AJ; Smit MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Dec; 27(12):2591-8. PubMed ID: 18611083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects assessment: boron compounds in the aquatic environment.
    Schoderboeck L; Mühlegger S; Losert A; Gausterer C; Hornek R
    Chemosphere; 2011 Jan; 82(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 21055789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Toxicity reference values and tissue residue criteria for protecting avian wildlife exposed to methylmercury in China.
    Zhang R; Wu F; Li H; Guo G; Feng C; Giesy JP; Chang H
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2013; 223():53-80. PubMed ID: 23149812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Deriving the aquatic predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) of three chlorophenols for the Taihu Lake, China.
    Lei BL; Huang SB; Jin XW; Wang Z
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Dec; 45(14):1823-31. PubMed ID: 20936560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predicting the threats of chemicals to wildlife: what are the challenges?
    Hernout BV; Arnold KE; McClean CJ; Grimm V; Boxall AB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jul; 7(3):499-501. PubMed ID: 21692171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Brief communication: the ecosystem perspective in ecotoxicology as a way forward for the ecological risk assessment of chemicals.
    De Laender F; Janssen CR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e34-8. PubMed ID: 23610029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Determination of the soil hazardous concentrations of bisphenol A using the species sensitivity approach.
    Kwak JI; Moon J; Kim D; Cui R; An YJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2018 Feb; 344():390-397. PubMed ID: 29096252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A bootstrap approach for lower injury levels of the risk curves.
    Lu YC; Untaroiu CD
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jun; 106(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 21549443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Non-parametric confidence interval estimation for competing risks analysis: application to contraceptive data.
    Choudhury JB
    Stat Med; 2002 Apr; 21(8):1129-44. PubMed ID: 11933038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Refined avian risk assessment for chlorpyrifos in the United States.
    Moore DR; Teed RS; Greer CD; Solomon KR; Giesy JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 231():163-217. PubMed ID: 24723136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A review of statistical issues with progression-free survival as an interval-censored time-to-event endpoint.
    Sun X; Li X; Chen C; Song Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):986-1003. PubMed ID: 23957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Field surveys can support ecological risk assessment.
    Iwasaki Y; Kagaya T; Ormerod SJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):171-2. PubMed ID: 23281239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Vision & strategy: Predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century.
    Villeneuve DL; Garcia-Reyero N
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21182100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.