These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24864597)

  • 1. Measurements of central corneal thickness using two immersion ultrasound techniques and optical technique.
    AlFarhan HM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 24864597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    Li EY; Mohamed S; Leung CK; Rao SK; Cheng AC; Cheung CY; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1842-7. PubMed ID: 17507097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement between Orbscan II, VuMAX UBM and Artemis-2 very-high frequency ultrasound scanner for measurement of anterior chamber depth.
    Al Farhan HM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 14():20. PubMed ID: 24564379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry.
    Hashemi H; Roshani M; Mehravaran S; Parsafar H; Yazdani K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1694-700. PubMed ID: 17889762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound, Orbscan II, and Visante OCT after LASIK for myopia.
    Cheng AC; Rao SK; Lau S; Leung CK; Lam DS
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 18500085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR
    Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system.
    Paul T; Lim M; Starr CE; Lloyd HO; Coleman DJ; Silverman RH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1906-12. PubMed ID: 19006737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
    Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the use of Orbscan II to assess the peripheral corneal thickness in humans: a comparison with ultrasound pachometry measures.
    Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ; Button NF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 17324208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Between Fourier-Domain OCT, Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound, and Scheimpflug Imaging Systems.
    Yap TE; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Reinstein DZ
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 32(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 26856428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.
    Williams R; Fink BA; King-Smith PE; Mitchell GL
    Cornea; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1238-43. PubMed ID: 21926567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods.
    McLaren JW; Nau CB; Erie JC; Bourne WM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 137(6):1011-20. PubMed ID: 15183784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal assessment technologies: current status.
    Rio-Cristobal A; Martin R
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2014; 59(6):599-614. PubMed ID: 25223496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal thickness and elevation measurements using swept-source optical coherence tomography and slit scanning topography in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Jhanji V; Yang B; Yu M; Ye C; Leung CK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 41(8):735-45. PubMed ID: 23566209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flap thickness reproducibility in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser: optical coherence tomography measurement.
    Kim JH; Lee D; Rhee KI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 18165093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia.
    Hashemi H; Mehravaran S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1701-7. PubMed ID: 17889763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymeter, optical coherence tomography and corneal topography.
    Pholshivin P; Tangpagasit W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95 Suppl 4():S123-8. PubMed ID: 22696864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and by Orbscan system in schoolchildren.
    Basmak H; Sahin A; Yildirim N
    Curr Eye Res; 2006; 31(7-8):569-75. PubMed ID: 16877265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
    Ho T; Cheng AC; Rao SK; Lau S; Leung CK; Lam DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1177-82. PubMed ID: 17586372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas.
    Bourges JL; Alfonsi N; Laliberté JF; Chagnon M; Renard G; Legeais JM; Brunette I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2064-71. PubMed ID: 19744719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.