BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24864597)

  • 1. Measurements of central corneal thickness using two immersion ultrasound techniques and optical technique.
    AlFarhan HM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 24864597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    Li EY; Mohamed S; Leung CK; Rao SK; Cheng AC; Cheung CY; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1842-7. PubMed ID: 17507097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement between Orbscan II, VuMAX UBM and Artemis-2 very-high frequency ultrasound scanner for measurement of anterior chamber depth.
    Al Farhan HM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 14():20. PubMed ID: 24564379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry.
    Hashemi H; Roshani M; Mehravaran S; Parsafar H; Yazdani K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1694-700. PubMed ID: 17889762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound, Orbscan II, and Visante OCT after LASIK for myopia.
    Cheng AC; Rao SK; Lau S; Leung CK; Lam DS
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 18500085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR
    Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system.
    Paul T; Lim M; Starr CE; Lloyd HO; Coleman DJ; Silverman RH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1906-12. PubMed ID: 19006737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
    Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the use of Orbscan II to assess the peripheral corneal thickness in humans: a comparison with ultrasound pachometry measures.
    Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ; Button NF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 17324208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Between Fourier-Domain OCT, Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound, and Scheimpflug Imaging Systems.
    Yap TE; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Reinstein DZ
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 32(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 26856428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.
    Williams R; Fink BA; King-Smith PE; Mitchell GL
    Cornea; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1238-43. PubMed ID: 21926567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods.
    McLaren JW; Nau CB; Erie JC; Bourne WM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 137(6):1011-20. PubMed ID: 15183784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal assessment technologies: current status.
    Rio-Cristobal A; Martin R
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2014; 59(6):599-614. PubMed ID: 25223496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal thickness and elevation measurements using swept-source optical coherence tomography and slit scanning topography in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Jhanji V; Yang B; Yu M; Ye C; Leung CK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 41(8):735-45. PubMed ID: 23566209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flap thickness reproducibility in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser: optical coherence tomography measurement.
    Kim JH; Lee D; Rhee KI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 18165093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia.
    Hashemi H; Mehravaran S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1701-7. PubMed ID: 17889763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymeter, optical coherence tomography and corneal topography.
    Pholshivin P; Tangpagasit W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95 Suppl 4():S123-8. PubMed ID: 22696864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and by Orbscan system in schoolchildren.
    Basmak H; Sahin A; Yildirim N
    Curr Eye Res; 2006; 31(7-8):569-75. PubMed ID: 16877265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
    Ho T; Cheng AC; Rao SK; Lau S; Leung CK; Lam DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1177-82. PubMed ID: 17586372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas.
    Bourges JL; Alfonsi N; Laliberté JF; Chagnon M; Renard G; Legeais JM; Brunette I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2064-71. PubMed ID: 19744719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.