These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24865388)

  • 1. Examining incentive design strategies for worksite wellness program engagement.
    Norman GJ; Heltemes KJ; Drew J
    Popul Health Manag; 2014 Dec; 17(6):324-31. PubMed ID: 24865388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of worksite and employee variables on employee engagement in telephonic health coaching programs: a retrospective multivariate analysis.
    Grossmeier J
    Am J Health Promot; 2013; 27(3):e69-80. PubMed ID: 23286600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a worksite wellness program designed to reduce cardiovascular risks.
    Roblin DW; Robinson BE; Benjamin SA
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2013; 36(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 24402067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the Well at Dell health management program: health risk change and financial return on investment.
    Musich S; McCalister T; Wang S; Hawkins K
    Am J Health Promot; 2015; 29(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 25559251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Healthy Workplace Project: results of a hygiene-based approach to employee wellness.
    Thompson SJ; Rew L
    Am J Health Promot; 2015; 29(5):339-41. PubMed ID: 24670070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in worksite health promotion.
    Lewis RJ; Huebner WW; Yarborough CM
    Am J Health Promot; 1996; 11(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 10163602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of financial incentives on behavior change program participation and risk reduction in worksite health promotion.
    Gingerich SB; Anderson DR; Koland H
    Am J Health Promot; 2012; 27(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 23113782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of wellness coaching for improving quality of life.
    Clark MM; Bradley KL; Jenkins SM; Mettler EA; Larson BG; Preston HR; Liesinger JT; Werneburg BL; Hagen PT; Harris AM; Riley BA; Olsen KD; Vickers Douglas KS
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1537-44. PubMed ID: 25107468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between medical costs and participation in the vitality health promotion program among 948,974 members of a South African health insurance company.
    Patel DN; Lambert EV; da Silva R; Greyling M; Nossel C; Noach A; Derman W; Gaziano T
    Am J Health Promot; 2010; 24(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 20073387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the Relationship Between Incentive Design and Participation in U.S. Workplace Wellness Programs.
    Batorsky B; Taylor E; Huang C; Liu H; Mattke S
    Am J Health Promot; 2016; 30(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26734957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designing an incentive based health promotion program.
    Sharkey PJ; Bey JM
    AAOHN J; 1998 Mar; 46(3):133-44; quiz 145-6. PubMed ID: 9582730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Employee engagement factors that affect enrollment compared with retention in two coaching programs--the ACTIVATE study.
    Terry PE; Fowles JB; Harvey L
    Popul Health Manag; 2010 Jun; 13(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 20521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employee Use of a Wireless Physical Activity Tracker Within Two Incentive Designs at One Company.
    Norman GJ; Heltemes KJ; Heck D; Osmick MJ
    Popul Health Manag; 2016 Apr; 19(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 26087300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ACTIVATE study: results from a group-randomized controlled trial comparing a traditional worksite health promotion program with an activated consumer program.
    Terry PE; Fowles JB; Xi M; Harvey L
    Am J Health Promot; 2011; 26(2):e64-73. PubMed ID: 22040398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating employee health risks due to hypertension and obesity: self-testing workplace health stations.
    Kelly JT
    Postgrad Med; 2009 Jan; 121(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19179824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is usage of a wellness center associated with improved quality of life?
    Clark MM; Jenkins SM; Limoges KA; Hagen PT; Lackore KA; Harris AM; Werneburg BL; Warren BA; Olsen KD
    Am J Health Promot; 2013; 27(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 23398132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does Skin in the Game Matter if You Aren't Playing? Examining Participation in Oregon's Public Employee Health Engagement Model.
    Wright BJ; Dulacki K; Rissi J; McBride L; Tran S; Royal N
    Am J Health Promot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 26389983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Associated With Participation in a University Worksite Wellness Program.
    Beck AJ; Hirth RA; Jenkins KR; Sleeman KK; Zhang W
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 51(1):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 26995315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a multicomponent workplace health promotion program conducted in Japan for improving employees' cardiovascular disease risk factors.
    Muto T; Yamauchi K
    Prev Med; 2001 Dec; 33(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 11716652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of health and wellness coaching in worksite health promotion.
    Chapman LS; Lesch N; Baun MP
    Am J Health Promot; 2007; 21(6):suppl 1-10, iii. PubMed ID: 17674643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.