BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24865579)

  • 1. The role of team goal monitoring in the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and team performance.
    Rapp TL; Bachrach DG; Rapp AA; Mullins R
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Sep; 99(5):976-87. PubMed ID: 24865579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance.
    Rapp AA; Bachrach DG; Rapp TL
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jul; 98(4):668-77. PubMed ID: 23379912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived shared understanding in teams: The motivational effect of being 'on the same page'.
    Aubé C; Rousseau V; Tremblay S
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 106(3):468-86. PubMed ID: 25278276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness.
    Shaw JD; Zhu J; Duffy MK; Scott KL; Shih HA; Susanto E
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Mar; 96(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 20939655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.
    Rico R; Sánchez-Manzanares M; Antino M; Lau D
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 21875173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time.
    Dierdorff EC; Bell ST; Belohlav JA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Mar; 96(2):247-62. PubMed ID: 20919792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams.
    Porter CO
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 16060798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do leader-member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model.
    Li AN; Liao H
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Sep; 99(5):847-66. PubMed ID: 25000359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when.
    Farh JL; Lee C; Farh CI
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Nov; 95(6):1173-80. PubMed ID: 20718515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness in top management group meetings: the role of goal clarity, focused communication, and learning behavior.
    Bang H; Fuglesang SL; Ovesen MR; Eilertsen DE
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 20132458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Goal Commitment and Partner Status on Team Assignment Outcomes.
    Miles JA
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Jun; 123(3):844-871. PubMed ID: 30654710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teams make it work: how team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams.
    Torrente P; Salanova M; Llorens S; Schaufeli WB
    Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 22269372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interteam Cooperation and Competition and Boundary Activities: The Cross-Level Mediation of Team Goal Orientations.
    Shin Y; Kim M; Hur WM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31370325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outperforming whom? A multilevel study of performance-prove goal orientation, performance, and the moderating role of shared team identification.
    Dietz B; van Knippenberg D; Hirst G; Restubog SL
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1811-24. PubMed ID: 26011723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When do business units benefit more from collective citizenship behavior of management teams? An upper echelons perspective.
    Liu W; Gong Y; Liu J
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 May; 99(3):523-34. PubMed ID: 24417551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective.
    De Dreu CK
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):628-38. PubMed ID: 17484546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: cross-level interactions with team informational resources.
    Richter AW; Hirst G; van Knippenberg D; Baer M
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Nov; 97(6):1282-90. PubMed ID: 22800186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: implications of asymmetry and dissensus.
    De Jong BA; Dirks KT
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):391-406. PubMed ID: 22181679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: the interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification.
    Pearsall MJ; Venkataramani V
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):735-48. PubMed ID: 25384202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.
    Park G; Deshon RP
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Sep; 95(5):824-33. PubMed ID: 20718527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.