172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24868175)
1. Evaluation of a minimally invasive procedure for sacroiliac joint fusion - an in vitro biomechanical analysis of initial and cycled properties.
Lindsey DP; Perez-Orribo L; Rodriguez-Martinez N; Reyes PM; Newcomb A; Cable A; Hickam G; Yerby SA; Crawford NR
Med Devices (Auckl); 2014; 7():131-7. PubMed ID: 24868175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel, Minimally Invasive, Sacroiliac Joint Fixation Device.
Cross WW; Berven SH; Slater N; Lehrman JN; Newcomb AGUS; Kelly BP
Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Oct; 12(5):587-594. PubMed ID: 30364882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of implant placement on sacroiliac joint range of motion: posterior versus transarticular.
Soriano-Baron H; Lindsey DP; Rodriguez-Martinez N; Reyes PM; Newcomb A; Yerby SA; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(9):E525-30. PubMed ID: 25705956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanics of unilateral and bilateral sacroiliac joint stabilization: laboratory investigation.
Lindsey DP; Parrish R; Gundanna M; Leasure J; Yerby SA; Kondrashov D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 29303472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of sacroiliac joint fixation with decortication.
Shih YC; Beaubien BP; Chen Q; Sembrano JN
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 29481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Cadaver-Based Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Posterior Approach to Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Analysis of the Fixation and Center of the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation.
Sayed D; Amirdelfan K; Naidu RK; Raji OR; Falowski S
Med Devices (Auckl); 2021; 14():435-444. PubMed ID: 34949942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.
Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Wilson DC; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):913-22. PubMed ID: 16217663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study.
Lindsey DP; Kiapour A; Yerby SA; Goel VK
Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():64. PubMed ID: 26767156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Biomechanical Changes After Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Application of the 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Technique.
Jeong JH; Leasure JM; Park J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():e538-e543. PubMed ID: 29933084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
Schmoelz W; Onder U; Martin A; von Strempel A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and initial evaluation of a finite element model of the pediatric craniocervical junction.
Phuntsok R; Mazur MD; Ellis BJ; Ravindra VM; Brockmeyer DL
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 Apr; 17(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 26684768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome.
Golubovsky JL; Colbrunn RW; Klatte RS; Nagle TF; Briskin IN; Chakravarthy VB; Gillespie CM; Reith JD; Jasty N; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
