These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2486906)

  • 1. Analysis of machine-selected cells with an image analysis system in normal and abnormal cervical specimens.
    Stenkvist B; Strande G
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Dec; 2(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 2486906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of contextual analysis for computer classification of cervical smears.
    Garcia GL; Kuklinski WS; Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Vooys PG; Brenner JF
    Cytometry; 1987 Mar; 8(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 3556101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interval-coded texture features for artifact rejection in automated cervical cytology.
    Tucker JH; Rodenacker K; Juetting U; Nickolls P; Watts K; Burger G
    Cytometry; 1988 Sep; 9(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 3053070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Image analysis study of squamous epithelial cells in cytological smears of the uterine cervix].
    Bergander S; König R; Geissler U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(16):1039-45. PubMed ID: 2220178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results of thousand cervical smears.
    Goyarts-Veldstra L; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Meyer F; Ploem JS
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():147-60. PubMed ID: 6578401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An automated cervical pre-cancerous diagnostic system.
    Mat-Isa NA; Mashor MY; Othman NH
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17996432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of malignancy-associated changes of the cervical epithelium in a hierarchic classification concept.
    Haroske G; Bergander S; König R; Meyer W
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Apr; 2(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 2275865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral analysis of cervical cells using the discrete Fourier transform.
    Banda-Gamboa H; Ricketts I; Cairns A; Hussein K
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Mar; 5(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 8466852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thionine-Feulgen-Congo red staining of cervical smears for the BioPEPR image-analysis system.
    Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Raaijmakers MC; Vooijs PG; Van de Walle RT
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Dec; 3(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 6174058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digitized pathology: theory and experiences in automated tissue-based virtual diagnosis.
    Kayser K; Radziszowski D; Bzdyl P; Sommer R; Kayser G
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2006; 47(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16838053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image cytometry in automated cervical screening.
    van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Feb; 1(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2488701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ellipse test for the reduction of false positive signals in automated cytology.
    Tucker JH; Eason P; Stark MH
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 364906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated and interactive lesion detection and segmentation in uterine cervix images.
    Alush A; Greenspan H; Goldberger J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):488-501. PubMed ID: 20129849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three different methods for automated classification of cervical cells.
    Palcic B; MacAulay C; Shlien S; Treurniet W; Tezcan H; Anderson G
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Nov; 4(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 1280993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An expanded cervical cell classification system validated by automated measurements.
    Stern E; Rosenthal DL; McLatchie C; White BS; Castleman KR
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1982 Jun; 4(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 7051909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image analysis in cytology: DNA-histogramming versus cervical smear prescreening.
    Bengtsson EW; Nordin B
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1993; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 8338254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
    Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
    Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hierarchical neural network assembly for classification of cervical cells in automated screening.
    Mehdi B; Stacey D; Harauz G
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Oct; 7(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 7848875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer recognition of ectocervical cells: image features.
    Bartels PH; Abmayr W; Bibbo M; Burger G; Soost HJ; Taylor J; Wied GL
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 7020518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subvisual chromatin changes in cervical epithelium measured by texture image analysis and correlated with HPV.
    Guillaud M; Adler-Storthz K; Malpica A; Staerkel G; Matisic J; Van Niekirk D; Cox D; Poulin N; Follen M; Macaulay C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S16-23. PubMed ID: 16188299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.