BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24869434)

  • 21. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cochlear implant placement: round window approach.
    Backous DD
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jan; 36(1 Suppl):1. PubMed ID: 24380531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review.
    Jayawardena J; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan G
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 22699985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Residual hearing preservation after cochlear implantation via round window or cochleostomy approach.
    Sun CH; Hsu CJ; Chen PR; Wu HP
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Jul; 125(7):1715-9. PubMed ID: 25583631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electro-Natural Stimulation in Partial Deafness Treatment of Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Long-Term Hearing Preservation Results.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Dziendziel B; Rajchel JJ; Matusiak M; Skarzynski PH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2019; 81(2-3):63-72. PubMed ID: 30921808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical, surgical, and electrical factors impacting residual hearing in cochlear implant surgery.
    Eshraghi AA; Ahmed J; Krysiak E; Ila K; Ashman P; Telischi FF; Angeli S; Prentiss S; Martinez D; Valendia S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 137(4):384-388. PubMed ID: 27918225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new method of partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Apr; 9(4):CS20-4. PubMed ID: 12709676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
    Guan T; Zhu Z; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment-electro acoustic stimulation (PDT-EAS).
    Sosna M; Tacikowska G; Pietrasik K; Skarżyński H; Lorens A; Skarżyński PH
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jul; 276(7):1951-1959. PubMed ID: 31053967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vibro-EAS: a proposal for electroacoustic stimulation.
    Schraven SP; Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Wildenstein D; Alkonyi B; Gummer AW; Hagen R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25275865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Atraumatic round window deep insertion of cochlear electrodes.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Zgoda M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski PH; Szkielkowska A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 131(7):740-9. PubMed ID: 21492068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binaural advantages in using a cochlear implant for adults with profound unilateral hearing loss.
    Lorens A; Kruszyńska M; Obrycka A; Skarzynski PH; Wilson B; Skarzynski H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 139(2):153-161. PubMed ID: 30762466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear implantation and residual hearing preservation long-term follow-up of the first consecutively operated patients using the round window approach in Uppsala, Sweden.
    Schart-Morén N; Erixon E; Li H; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Sep; 21(5):246-259. PubMed ID: 32515304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electric acoustic stimulation in children.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():135-143. PubMed ID: 19955730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.