BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24869434)

  • 41. Auditory and cognitive development in a partially deaf child with bilateral electro-acoustic stimulation: a case study.
    Seebacher J; Muigg F; Fischer N; Weichbold V; Stephan K; Zorowka P; Bliem HR; Schmutzhard J
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 29025322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cochlear implantation in asymmetrical hearing loss for children: our experience.
    Tzifa K; Hanvey K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S56-61. PubMed ID: 24533767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing.
    Yoshimura H; Moteki H; Nishio SY; Usami SI
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 140(8):632-638. PubMed ID: 32498646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Hearing preservation surgery: cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic review.
    Havenith S; Lammers MJ; Tange RA; Trabalzini F; della Volpe A; van der Heijden GJ; Grolman W
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 23640087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analysis of factors affecting hearing preservation after cochlear implantation.
    Piotrowska A; Lorens A; Jedrzejczak WW; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():114-6. PubMed ID: 21756594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modelling the effect of round window stiffness on residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Elliott SJ; Ni G; Verschuur CA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():155-167. PubMed ID: 27586580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bilateral cochlear implants in long-term and short-term deafness.
    McNeill C; Noble W; Purdy SC; O'Brien A; Sharma M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 22340752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches.
    Karatas E; Aud MD; Baglam T; Durucu C; Baysal E; Kanlikama M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 21737149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L; Mandalà M; Colletti V
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
    Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Kroeger S; Ihorst G; Wesarg T
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21068690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. FS4 for partial deafness treatment.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Polak M; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S78-80. PubMed ID: 24869452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cochlear implantation in patients deafened by ototoxic drugs.
    Nichani J; Bruce IA; Mawman D; Khwaja S; Ramsden R; Green K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Sep; 14(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 23510699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electric acoustic stimulation in patients with postlingual severe high-frequency hearing loss: clinical experience.
    Arnoldner C; Helbig S; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS; Riss D; Gstoettner W
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():116-124. PubMed ID: 19955728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation: a meta-analysis.
    Santa Maria PL; Gluth MB; Yuan Y; Atlas MD; Blevins NH
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e256-69. PubMed ID: 25233333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [New method of partial deafness treatment].
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(4):811-6. PubMed ID: 15603395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of Round Window Opening Size on Residual Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.
    Gotamco GL; Sun CH; Chou YF; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Aug; 163(2):375-381. PubMed ID: 32204664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fitting of the hearing system affects partial deafness cochlear implant performance.
    Polak M; Lorens A; Helbig S; McDonald S; McDonald S; Vermeire K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():117-21. PubMed ID: 21756595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Long-term follow-up of hearing preservation in electric-acoustic stimulation patients.
    Mertens G; Punte AK; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1765-72. PubMed ID: 25133472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Understanding minds: early cochlear implantation and the development of theory of mind in children with profound hearing impairment.
    Sundqvist A; Lyxell B; Jönsson R; Heimann M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 78(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 24485174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.