These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24869446)
1. Cochlear's unique electrode portfolio now and in the future. von Wallenberg E; Briggs R Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S59-61. PubMed ID: 24869446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants. Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes. Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 Electrode Arrays. O'Connell BP; Hunter JB; Gifford RH; Rivas A; Haynes DS; Noble JH; Wanna GB Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1032-5. PubMed ID: 27525618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report]. Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preservation of cochlear structures and hearing when using the Nucleus Slim Straight (CI422) electrode in children. Skarzynski H; Matusiak M; Lorens A; Furmanek M; Pilka A; Skarzynski PH J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 26763105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422. Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing. Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes. Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears. Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Intraoperative Radiographs in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Surgery. Savoca E; Smith B; Shaffer AD; Kitsko D; Chi D Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1282-1289. PubMed ID: 37051895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode. Riemann C; Sudhoff H; Todt I Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():6917084. PubMed ID: 31240221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association Between Intracochlear Electrode Design and Electrically-Evoked Compound Action Potential Measures in Cochlear Implant Users. Kim JS; Hong SH; Moon IJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Sep; 171(3):849-857. PubMed ID: 38774957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects. Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children. Telmesani LM; Said NM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 May; 79(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 25746517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant. Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]