BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24869453)

  • 1. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
    Zhou L; Friedmann DR; Treaba C; Peng R; Roland JT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S8-S10. PubMed ID: 24869453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
    Zhou L; Friedmann DR; Treaba C; Peng R; Roland JT
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):966-71. PubMed ID: 25345671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.
    Addams-Williams J; Munaweera L; Coleman B; Shepherd R; Backhouse S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S36-9. PubMed ID: 21917217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insertion site and sealing technique affect residual hearing and tissue formation after cochlear implantation.
    Burghard A; Lenarz T; Kral A; Paasche G
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():21-7. PubMed ID: 24566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atraumatic Scala Tympani Cochleostomy; Resolution of the Dilemma.
    Badr A; Shabana Y; Mokbel K; Elsharabasy A; Ghonim M; Sanna M
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Aug; 14(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 30100542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Different Insertion Techniques of a Cochlear Implant Electrode on the Intracochlear Pressure.
    Todt I; Ernst A; Mittmann P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 26794906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.
    Adunka O; Unkelbach MH; Mack M; Hambek M; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 124(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 15370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Round window insertion of precurved electrodes is traumatic.
    Jeyakumar A; Peña SF; Brickman TM
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 24270713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Round window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it?
    Souter MA; Briggs RJ; Wright CG; Roland PS
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 21131883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Stidham K; Roberson JB
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 125(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 16158535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the hybrid-L24 electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Driscoll CL; Carlson ML; Fama AF; Lane JI
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Jul; 121(7):1508-16. PubMed ID: 21541948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit of Preoperative Temporal Bone CT for Atraumatic Cochlear Implantation.
    Karkas A; Champfleur NM; Uziel A; Mondain M; Puel JL; Venail F
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):e186-e194. PubMed ID: 29342055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation.
    Adunka O; Gstoettner W; Hambek M; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Kiefer J
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(6):306-12. PubMed ID: 15668529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A New Slim Modiolar Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation: A Radiological and Histological Study.
    Iso-Mustajärvi M; Matikka H; Risi F; Sipari S; Koski T; Willberg T; Lehtimäki A; Tervaniemi J; Löppönen H; Dietz A
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e327-e334. PubMed ID: 28796083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lamb Temporal Bone as a Surgical Training Model of Round Window Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.
    Mantokoudis G; Huth ME; Weisstanner C; Friedrich HM; Nauer C; Candreia C; Caversaccio MD; Senn P
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26649606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones.
    Hassepass F; Bulla S; Maier W; Laszig R; Arndt S; Beck R; Traser L; Aschendorff A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1415-20. PubMed ID: 24836594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.