172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24869673)
1. Do unto others: doctors' personal end-of-life resuscitation preferences and their attitudes toward advance directives.
Periyakoil VS; Neri E; Fong A; Kraemer H
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e98246. PubMed ID: 24869673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making.
Mebane EW; Oman RF; Kroonen LT; Goldstein MK
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1999 May; 47(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 10323652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians attitudes toward DNR of terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan.
Chao CS
J Nurs Res; 2002 Sep; 10(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 12244518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Allow Natural Death" versus "Do Not Resuscitate": What Do Patients with Advanced Cancer Choose?
Miljković MD; Emuron D; Rhodes L; Abraham J; Miller K
J Palliat Med; 2015 May; 18(5):457-60. PubMed ID: 25825919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No Easy Talk: A Mixed Methods Study of Doctor Reported Barriers to Conducting Effective End-of-Life Conversations with Diverse Patients.
Periyakoil VS; Neri E; Kraemer H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122321. PubMed ID: 25902309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Doctors' attitudes regarding not for resuscitation orders.
Sritharan G; Mills AC; Levinson MR; Gellie AL
Aust Health Rev; 2017 Dec; 41(6):680-687. PubMed ID: 27883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Doctors' perspectives on adhering to advance care directives when making medical decisions for patients: an Australian interview study.
Moore N; Detering KM; Low T; Nolte L; Fraser S; Sellars M
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e032638. PubMed ID: 31676659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors that influence advance directives completion amongst terminally ill patients at a tertiary hospital in Kenya.
Omondi S; Weru J; Shaikh AJ; Yonga G
BMC Palliat Care; 2017 Jan; 16(1):9. PubMed ID: 28118824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with implementation of the POLST paradigm: results from a survey of Florida physicians.
Matthews JJ; Souther CE
Care Manag J; 2013; 14(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 24579271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Teno J; Lynn J; Connors AF; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Alzola C; Murphy DP; Desbiens N; Knaus WA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 9100723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes and self-reported end-of-life care of Australian and New Zealand intensive care doctors in the context of organ donation after circulatory death.
Lee YY; Ranse K; Silvester W; Mehta A; Van Haren F
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2018 Sep; 46(5):488-497. PubMed ID: 30189823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting the attitudes and opinions of ICU physicians regarding end-of-life decisions for their patients and themselves: A survey study from Turkey.
Baykara N; Utku T; Alparslan V; Arslantaş MK; Ersoy N
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232743. PubMed ID: 32433670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergency clinicians' attitudes and decisions in patient scenarios involving advance directives.
Wong RE; Weiland TJ; Jelinek GA
Emerg Med J; 2012 Sep; 29(9):720-4. PubMed ID: 22011972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the Attitude and Practice Toward End-of-Life Care: Perspective of Chinese Physicians in Medical Department.
Lam KW; Yeung KW; Lai KY; Cheng F
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2015 Aug; 32(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 24819729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The association between religiosity and resuscitation status preference among patients with advanced cancer.
Delgado-Guay MO; Chisholm G; Williams J; Bruera E
Palliat Support Care; 2015 Oct; 13(5):1435-9. PubMed ID: 25739871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences of Advance Decisions, End-of-Life Care, and Place of Care and Death in Hong Kong. A Population-Based Telephone Survey of 1067 Adults.
Chung RY; Wong EL; Kiang N; Chau PY; Lau JYC; Wong SY; Yeoh EK; Woo JW
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2017 Apr; 18(4):367.e19-367.e27. PubMed ID: 28214237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes of Danish doctors and nurses to palliative and terminal care.
Vejlgaard T; Addington-Hall JM
Palliat Med; 2005 Mar; 19(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15810750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.
Richter J; Eisemann M; Zgonnikova E
J Med Ethics; 2001 Jun; 27(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 11417027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Covinsky KE; Fuller JD; Yaffe K; Johnston CB; Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Phillips RS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S187-93. PubMed ID: 10809474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]