These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. CONE BEAM CT IN DENTAL IMPLANT PLANNING: HOW CLOSE ARE PATIENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS WITH DATA FROM PHANTOM STUDIES FOUND IN LITERATURE? Kottou S; Zapros A; Stefanopoulou N; Krompas N; Tsapaki V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):321-326. PubMed ID: 31297525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning. Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. Pauwels R; Silkosessak O; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20140059. PubMed ID: 24708447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass? Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GMB; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180290. PubMed ID: 30540919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology. Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction. Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Exposure Parameters and Voxel Size for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on the Image Matching Accuracy with an Optical Dental Scan Image: An In Vitro Study. Mai HN; Lee DH Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6971828. PubMed ID: 34222482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images. Vasconcelos TV; Bechara BB; McMahan CA; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Feb; 123(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 28086998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts. Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180151. PubMed ID: 29916722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study. Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols. Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of dual-energy technique for virtual monochromatic and linearly mixed CBCTs. Li H; Giles W; Ren L; Bowsher J; Yin FF Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6056-64. PubMed ID: 23039644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction of image artifacts from treatment couch in cone-beam CT from kV on-board imaging. Ali I; Ahmad S; Alsbou N; Lovelock DM; Kriminski S; Amols H J Xray Sci Technol; 2011; 19(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 21876282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom. Elkhateeb SM; Torgersen GR; Arnout EA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20160075. PubMed ID: 27078054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]