These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24870396)

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of the nonlinear displacement-load behavior of the lumbar spine.
    Hanlon AD; Cook DJ; Yeager MS; Cheng BC
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Aug; 136(8):. PubMed ID: 24870396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sagittal plane motion in the human lumbar spine: comparison of the in vitro quasistatic neutral zone and dynamic motion parameters.
    Gay RE; Ilharreborde B; Zhao K; Zhao C; An KN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):914-9. PubMed ID: 16759773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of nonlinearity in the materials used for the semi-rigid pedicle screw systems on biomechanical behaviors of the lumbar spine after surgery.
    Kim H; Lim DH; Oh HJ; Lee KY; Lee SJ
    Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 6(5):055005. PubMed ID: 21849724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
    Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load.
    Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1134-47. PubMed ID: 23507531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The micromechanical role of the annulus fibrosus components under physiological loading of the lumbar spine.
    Ayturk UM; Garcia JJ; Puttlitz CM
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jun; 132(6):061007. PubMed ID: 20887032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of slouching and lumbar support on iliolumbar ligaments, intervertebral discs and sacroiliac joints.
    Snijders CJ; Hermans PF; Niesing R; Spoor CW; Stoeckart R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 15109750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The stabilizing axial spinal pillar in the lumbar spine.
    Iencean SM
    Spinal Cord; 2002 Apr; 40(4):178-85. PubMed ID: 11965556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic application of a dynamic resultant force vector using real-time load-control: simulation of an ideal follower load on Cadaveric L4-L5 segments.
    Bennett CR; Kelly BP
    J Biomech; 2013 Aug; 46(12):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23809771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The basis of mechanical instability in degenerative disc disease: a cadaveric study of abnormal motion versus load distribution.
    Sengupta DK; Fan H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):1032-43. PubMed ID: 24583744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The viscoelastic standard nonlinear solid model: predicting the response of the lumbar intervertebral disk to low-frequency vibrations.
    Groth KM; Granata KP
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031005. PubMed ID: 18532854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compressive preload reduces segmental flexion instability after progressive destabilization of the lumbar spine.
    Fry RW; Alamin TF; Voronov LI; Fielding LC; Ghanayem AJ; Parikh A; Carandang G; Mcintosh BW; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E74-81. PubMed ID: 24153162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.
    Renner SM; Natarajan RN; Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Guo BY; Andersson GB; An HS
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(6):1326-32. PubMed ID: 16843473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of surface strain data and a neural networks solution method to determine lumbar facet joint loads during in vitro spine testing.
    Sawa AG; Crawford NR
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2647-53. PubMed ID: 18657814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional static modeling of the lumbar spine.
    Karadogan E; Williams RL
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 Aug; 134(8):084504. PubMed ID: 22938364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
    Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; DiRisio DJ; Cohen B; Uhl RL
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and validation of a novel Cartesian biomechanical testing system with coordinated 6DOF real-time load control: application to the lumbar spine (L1-S, L4-L5).
    Kelly BP; Bennett CR
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1948-54. PubMed ID: 23764173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.