275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24871227)
1. The roles of cornea and axial length in corneal hysteresis among emmetropes and high myopes: a pilot study.
Wong YZ; Lam AK
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Mar; 40(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 24871227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High myopes have lower normalised corneal tangent moduli (less 'stiff' corneas) than low myopes.
Hon Y; Chen GZ; Lu SH; Lam DC; Lam AK
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 27873338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST.
Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters.
Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P
Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship among corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length.
Bueno-Gimeno I; España-Gregori E; Gene-Sampedro A; Lanzagorta-Aresti A; Piñero-Llorens DP
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 May; 91(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 24705484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical properties of axially myopic cornea.
Altan C; Demirel B; Azman E; Satana B; Bozkurt E; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22 Suppl 7():S24-8. PubMed ID: 21748728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal biomechanical properties measured with the Ocular Response Analyser in a myopic population.
Plakitsi A; O'Donnell C; Miranda MA; Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jul; 31(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 21615446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors.
İnceoğlu N; Emre S; Ulusoy MO
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 28540493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Off-axis partial coherence interferometry in myopes and emmetropes.
Ehsaei A; Chisholm CM; Pacey IE; Mallen EA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 23170781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos.
Altan C; Kara N; Baz O; Satana B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 22399691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A
Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children.
Lim L; Gazzard G; Chan YH; Fong A; Kotecha A; Sim EL; Tan D; Tong L; Saw SM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 49(9):3852-7. PubMed ID: 18469185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature.
Franco S; Lira M
Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Nov; 92(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 19694758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in high myopic anisometropia.
Xu S; Xu A; Tao A; Wang J; Fan F; Lu F
Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Jul; 36(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 20531203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different keratoplasty techniques on the biomechanical properties of the cornea.
Abdelkader A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e567-72. PubMed ID: 23879240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK.
Chen S; Chen D; Wang J; Lu F; Wang Q; Qu J
J Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 26(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 20415324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
