These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24871872)

  • 1. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler.
    Lorne E; Mahjoub Y; Diouf M; Sleghem J; Buchalet C; Guinot PG; Petiot S; Kessavane A; Dehedin B; Dupont H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 24871872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
    Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of continuous cardiac output monitoring derived from regional impedance cardiography with continuous thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients.
    Bhavya G; Nagaraja PS; Singh NG; Ragavendran S; Sathish N; Manjunath N; Kumar KA; Nayak VB
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2020; 23(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 32275034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive assessment of Cardiac Index using impedance cardiography during liver transplantation surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
    Suparschi V; Le Bihan E; Toussaint A; Saptefrat D; Ben Abdallah H; Gloulou F; Aouati F; Gauss T; Paugam-Burtz C
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Jan; 85(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29745622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
    Møller-Sørensen H; Cordtz J; Østergaard M; Nilsson JC; Hansen KL
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 26578096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac™/Vigileo™ and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery.
    Kim JY; Kim BR; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim JH; Lee SI; Kim KT; Choe WJ; Park JS; Kim JW
    J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23803309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
    Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
    Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
    Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable.
    Møller-Sørensen H; Graeser K; Hansen KL; Zemtsovski M; Sander EM; Nilsson JC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2014 Jan; 58(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 24192143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis of Cardiac Output in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Prospective, Observational Study.
    Montenij LJ; Sonneveld JP; Nierich AP; Buhre WF; De Waal EE
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jan; 30(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 26520028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.
    Cho YJ; Koo CH; Kim TK; Hong DM; Jeon Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):771-782. PubMed ID: 26429135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output.
    Schmidt C; Theilmeier G; Van Aken H; Korsmeier P; Wirtz SP; Berendes E; Hoffmeier A; Meissner A
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Nov; 95(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 16155037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oesophageal Doppler and calibrated pulse contour analysis are not interchangeable within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm in major gynaecological surgery.
    Feldheiser A; Hunsicker O; Krebbel H; Weimann K; Kaufner L; Wernecke KD; Spies C
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 113(5):822-31. PubMed ID: 25107544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output.
    Trinkmann F; Berger M; Doesch C; Papavassiliu T; Schoenberg SO; Borggrefe M; Kaden JJ; Saur J
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Aug; 30(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 26115774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impedance cardiography for monitoring changes in cardiac output.
    Parashar R; Bajpai M; Goyal M; Singh S; Tiwari S; Narayan VS
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 23387239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arterial pressure waveform analysis versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective observational study.
    Montenij LJ; Buhre WF; de Jong SA; Harms JH; van Herwaarden JA; Kruitwagen CL; de Waal EE
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo software to track changes in cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients: a polar plot approach.
    Desebbe O; Henaine R; Keller G; Koffel C; Garcia H; Rosamel P; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Haftek M; Critchley LA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1122-7. PubMed ID: 24011911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved Performance of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System for Tracking Cardiac Output Changes.
    Suehiro K; Tanaka K; Mikawa M; Uchihara Y; Matsuyama T; Matsuura T; Funao T; Yamada T; Mori T; Nishikawa K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015; 29(3):656-62. PubMed ID: 25440654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.