These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24871918)

  • 1. Autogrid-based clustering of kinases: selection of representative conformations for docking purposes.
    Marzaro G; Ferrarese A; Chilin A
    Mol Divers; 2014 Aug; 18(3):611-9. PubMed ID: 24871918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Effective Approach for Clustering InhA Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Using Substrate-Binding Cavity Features.
    De Paris R; Quevedo CV; Ruiz DD; Norberto de Souza O
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133172. PubMed ID: 26218832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of Crystal Structures in Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Protein Kinase Inhibitors.
    Chen X; Liu H; Xie W; Yang Y; Wang Y; Fan Y; Hua Y; Zhu L; Zhao J; Lu T; Chen Y; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Dec; 59(12):5244-5262. PubMed ID: 31689093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of Protein-compound Binding Energies from Known Activity Data: Docking-score-based Method and its Applications.
    Fukunishi Y; Yamashita Y; Mashimo T; Nakamura H
    Mol Inform; 2018 Jul; 37(6-7):e1700120. PubMed ID: 29442436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of multiple protein docking structures using correctly predicted pairwise subunits.
    Esquivel-Rodríguez J; Kihara D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S6. PubMed ID: 22536869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating Multiple Receptor Conformation Docking and Multi Dimensional QSAR for Enhancing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Radhika V; Jaraf HA; Kanth SS; Vijjulatha M
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2017; 13(2):127-142. PubMed ID: 28103770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking of structure refinement methods for protein complex models.
    Verburgt J; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2022 Jan; 90(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 34309909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing an ensemble docking-based virtual screening strategy for kinase targets by considering protein flexibility.
    Tian S; Sun H; Pan P; Li D; Zhen X; Li Y; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2664-79. PubMed ID: 25233367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacophore generation, atom-based 3D-QSAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies on benzamide analogues as FtsZ inhibitors.
    Tripathy S; Azam MA; Jupudi S; Sahu SK
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Sep; 36(12):3218-3230. PubMed ID: 28938860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
    Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of potential PKC inhibitors through pharmacophore designing, 3D-QSAR and molecular dynamics simulations targeting Alzheimer's disease.
    Iqbal S; Anantha Krishnan D; Gunasekaran K
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Nov; 36(15):4029-4044. PubMed ID: 29182053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing Kinase Similarity in Small Molecule and Protein Structural Space to Explore the Limits of Multi-Target Screening.
    Schmidt D; Scharf MM; Sydow D; Aßmann E; Martí-Solano M; Keul M; Volkamer A; Kolb P
    Molecules; 2021 Jan; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 33530327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Molecules; 2018 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 29710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RapidRMSD: rapid determination of RMSDs corresponding to motions of flexible molecules.
    Neveu E; Popov P; Hoffmann A; Migliosi A; Besseron X; Danoy G; Bouvry P; Grudinin S
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(16):2757-2765. PubMed ID: 29554205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.
    Estrada T; Zhang B; Cicotti P; Armen RS; Taufer M
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jul; 42(7):758-71. PubMed ID: 22658682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient computation of root mean square deviations under rigid transformations.
    Hildebrandt AK; Dietzen M; Lengauer T; Lenhof HP; Althaus E; Hildebrandt A
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Apr; 35(10):765-71. PubMed ID: 24356990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New additions to the ClusPro server motivated by CAPRI.
    Vajda S; Yueh C; Beglov D; Bohnuud T; Mottarella SE; Xia B; Hall DR; Kozakov D
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 27936493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.