These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24873157)
1. [Circumcision with no-flip Shang Ring technique for adult males: analysis of 168 cases]. Lei JH; Liu LR; Lü X; Cheng SH; Cai YC; Chen YJ; Wei Q; Zhu YC Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 24873157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Outward versus inward placement in Shang Ring circumcision for phimosis and redundant prepuce in adult men: analysis of 527 cases]. Xie ST; Chen GY; Wei QH; Liu XT; Jiao L; Tang Y Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 24873158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Novel no-flip Shang Ring circumcision for adult males: a clinical application study of 528 cases]. Yang BH; Jia C; Liu T; Peng YF Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Aug; 20(8):709-14. PubMed ID: 25195367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii]. Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring in children: outcomes of 824 cases]. Yan B; You H; Zhang K; Tang HY; Mao W; He GH; Yin ZG Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Mar; 16(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 20369555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases]. Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China]. Cheng Y; Peng YF; Liu YD; Tian L; Lü NQ; Su XJ; Yan ZJ; Hu JS; Lee R; Kim HH; Sokal DC; Li PS Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 15(7):584-92. PubMed ID: 19694369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness]. Li HN; Xu J; Qu LM Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 20626160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Shang Ring scissor circumcision versus electrotome circumcision for redundant prepuce]. Tang XH; Zhang P; Ding H; Zhao JH; Tang LL; Fang Q Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Oct; 22(10):877-881. PubMed ID: 29278467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: A network meta-analysis. Huang C; Song P; Xu C; Wang R; Wei L; Zhao X Int J Surg; 2017 Jul; 43():17-25. PubMed ID: 28522221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Shang Ring versus disposable circumcision suture device in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce]. Wang SX; Zhang ZB; Yang SF; Yang EM; Pan DS; Xie XQ; Lin XH; Yang MY Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Jun; 22(6):534-537. PubMed ID: 28963844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circumcision with "no-flip Shang Ring" and "Dorsal Slit" methods for adult males: a single-centered, prospective, clinical study. Lei JH; Liu LR; Wei Q; Xue WB; Song TR; Yan SB; Yang L; Han P; Zhu YC Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(5):798-802. PubMed ID: 26585694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A novel disposable ring versus the suture device in circumcision]. Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Tang ZM Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29738180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis]. Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Standardized male circumcision with Shang Ring reduces postoperative complications: a report of 351 cases]. Peng YF; Yang BH; Jia C; Jiang J Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Nov; 16(11):963-6. PubMed ID: 21218635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A novel disposable circumcision device versus conventional surgery in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis]. Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Li JH; Tang ZM Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Nov; 23(11):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29738167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults. Wu X; Wang Y; Zheng J; Shen W; Yan JA; Ji H; Li X; Zhang H; Zhou Z Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23465168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce]. Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)]. Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparative study of three different circumcision devices for redundant prepuce and phimosis]. Zhang M; Wei LJ Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Aug; 27(8):729-732. PubMed ID: 34914246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]