247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24873157)
1. [Circumcision with no-flip Shang Ring technique for adult males: analysis of 168 cases].
Lei JH; Liu LR; Lü X; Cheng SH; Cai YC; Chen YJ; Wei Q; Zhu YC
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 24873157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Outward versus inward placement in Shang Ring circumcision for phimosis and redundant prepuce in adult men: analysis of 527 cases].
Xie ST; Chen GY; Wei QH; Liu XT; Jiao L; Tang Y
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 24873158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Novel no-flip Shang Ring circumcision for adult males: a clinical application study of 528 cases].
Yang BH; Jia C; Liu T; Peng YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Aug; 20(8):709-14. PubMed ID: 25195367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring in children: outcomes of 824 cases].
Yan B; You H; Zhang K; Tang HY; Mao W; He GH; Yin ZG
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Mar; 16(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 20369555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China].
Cheng Y; Peng YF; Liu YD; Tian L; Lü NQ; Su XJ; Yan ZJ; Hu JS; Lee R; Kim HH; Sokal DC; Li PS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 15(7):584-92. PubMed ID: 19694369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness].
Li HN; Xu J; Qu LM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 20626160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Shang Ring scissor circumcision versus electrotome circumcision for redundant prepuce].
Tang XH; Zhang P; Ding H; Zhao JH; Tang LL; Fang Q
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Oct; 22(10):877-881. PubMed ID: 29278467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: A network meta-analysis.
Huang C; Song P; Xu C; Wang R; Wei L; Zhao X
Int J Surg; 2017 Jul; 43():17-25. PubMed ID: 28522221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Shang Ring versus disposable circumcision suture device in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce].
Wang SX; Zhang ZB; Yang SF; Yang EM; Pan DS; Xie XQ; Lin XH; Yang MY
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Jun; 22(6):534-537. PubMed ID: 28963844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circumcision with "no-flip Shang Ring" and "Dorsal Slit" methods for adult males: a single-centered, prospective, clinical study.
Lei JH; Liu LR; Wei Q; Xue WB; Song TR; Yan SB; Yang L; Han P; Zhu YC
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(5):798-802. PubMed ID: 26585694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A novel disposable ring versus the suture device in circumcision].
Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Tang ZM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29738180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis].
Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Standardized male circumcision with Shang Ring reduces postoperative complications: a report of 351 cases].
Peng YF; Yang BH; Jia C; Jiang J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Nov; 16(11):963-6. PubMed ID: 21218635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A novel disposable circumcision device versus conventional surgery in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis].
Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Li JH; Tang ZM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Nov; 23(11):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29738167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults.
Wu X; Wang Y; Zheng J; Shen W; Yan JA; Ji H; Li X; Zhang H; Zhou Z
Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23465168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].
Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)].
Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparative study of three different circumcision devices for redundant prepuce and phimosis].
Zhang M; Wei LJ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Aug; 27(8):729-732. PubMed ID: 34914246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
