137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24874025)
1. Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy.
Zheng L; Li Z; Li Q; Ji F; Cai Z
Med Sci Monit; 2014 May; 20():889-93. PubMed ID: 24874025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstruction after total sacrectomy using a new instrumentation technique: a biomechanical comparison.
Kawahara N; Murakami H; Yoshida A; Sakamoto J; Oda J; Tomita K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1567-72. PubMed ID: 12865846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of a 3D-printed sacrum prosthesis versus rod-screw systems for reconstruction after total sacrectomy: A finite element analysis.
Huang S; Ji T; Guo W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Dec; 70():203-208. PubMed ID: 31655451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of reconstructed lumbosacral spine after total sacrectomy.
Murakami H; Kawahara N; Tomita K; Sakamoto J; Oda J
J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 12486469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical effects of partial sacrectomy: when is reconstruction necessary?
Hugate RR; Dickey ID; Phimolsarnti R; Yaszemski MJ; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Sep; 450():82-8. PubMed ID: 16906087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of four reconstruction methods after total sacrectomy: a finite element study.
Zhu R; Cheng LM; Yu Y; Zander T; Chen B; Rohlmann A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Oct; 27(8):771-6. PubMed ID: 22705158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three reconstruction techniques following total sacrectomy: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Macki M; De la Garza-Ramos R; Murgatroyd AA; Mullinix KP; Sun X; Cunningham BW; McCutcheon BA; Bydon M; Gokaslan ZL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):570-577. PubMed ID: 28777063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total sacrectomy and reconstruction for sacral tumors.
Doita M; Harada T; Iguchi T; Sumi M; Sha H; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):E296-301. PubMed ID: 12897508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of spinopelvic reconstruction techniques in the setting of total sacrectomy.
Mindea SA; Chinthakunta S; Moldavsky M; Gudipally M; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1622-7. PubMed ID: 23038619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effects of transverse partial sacrectomy on the sacroiliac joints: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation of the borderline of sacroiliac joint instability.
Yu B; Zheng Z; Zhuang X; Chen H; Xie D; Luk KD; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1370-5. PubMed ID: 19478657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The most appropriate titanium mesh cage size for anterior spinal reconstruction after single-level lumbar total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study.
Paholpak P; Sirichativapee W; Wisanuyotin T; Kosuwon W; Kasai Y; Murakami H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Mar; 16(1):178. PubMed ID: 33750424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What Are the Functional Outcomes After Total Sacrectomy Without Spinopelvic Reconstruction?
Kiatisevi P; Piyaskulkaew C; Kunakornsawat S; Sukunthanak B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):643-655. PubMed ID: 26911974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery Using a Dual-Rod Technique with Diverse U-Shaped Rods After Posterior En Bloc Partial Sacrectomy for a Sacral Tumor: 2 Case Reports and a Literature Review.
Choi MK; Jo DJ; Kim SB
World Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 95():619.e11-619.e18. PubMed ID: 27544341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Development and current situation of reconstruction methods following total sacrectomy].
Huang S; Ji T; Guo W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 32(5):513-518. PubMed ID: 29806335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term clinical outcome of sacral chondrosarcoma treated by total en bloc sacrectomy and reconstruction of lumbosacral and pelvic ring using intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated autologous tumor-bearing sacrum: a case report with 10 years follow-up.
Nishizawa K; Mori K; Saruhashi Y; Takahashi S; Matsusue Y
Spine J; 2014 May; 14(5):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24262861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of the screw in percutaneous axial lumbosacral interbody fusion.
Xu HG; Yang XM; Wu TL; Wang H; Chen XW; Wang LT; Jin S; Liu P
Orthop Surg; 2010 Aug; 2(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 22009950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of supplemental percutaneous lumbo-sacro-iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation following total sacrectomy.
Le VH; Heckmann N; Jain N; Wang L; Turner AW; Lee TQ; Bederman SS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E181-5. PubMed ID: 25905801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Associated With Spinopelvic Fixation Mechanical Failure After Total Sacrectomy.
Tang X; Yang R; Qu H; Cai Z; Guo W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Sep; 43(18):1268-1274. PubMed ID: 29538241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
