BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24874082)

  • 1. Uncertainty in model predictions of Vibrio vulnificus response to climate variability and change: a Chesapeake Bay case study.
    Urquhart EA; Zaitchik BF; Waugh DW; Guikema SD; Del Castillo CE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e98256. PubMed ID: 24874082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and spatial variability in the distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay: a hindcast study.
    Banakar V; Constantin de Magny G; Jacobs J; Murtugudde R; Huq A; Wood RJ; Colwell RR
    Ecohealth; 2011 Dec; 8(4):456-67. PubMed ID: 22302219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seasonal and Geographical Differences in Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Levels in Seawater and Oysters from the Delaware and Chesapeake Bays Determined Using Several Methods.
    Parveen S; Jacobs J; Ozbay G; Chintapenta LK; Almuhaideb E; Meredith J; Ossai S; Abbott A; Grant A; Brohawn K; Chigbu P; Richards GP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Nov; 86(23):. PubMed ID: 32978135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental Factors Influencing Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus.
    Brumfield KD; Chen AJ; Gangwar M; Usmani M; Hasan NA; Jutla AS; Huq A; Colwell RR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Jun; 89(6):e0030723. PubMed ID: 37222620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recreational swimmers' exposure to Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA.
    Shaw KS; Sapkota AR; Jacobs JM; He X; Crump BC
    Environ Int; 2015 Jan; 74():99-105. PubMed ID: 25454225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling and forecasting the distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in Chesapeake Bay.
    Jacobs JM; Rhodes M; Brown CW; Hood RR; Leight A; Long W; Wood R
    J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Nov; 117(5):1312-27. PubMed ID: 25139334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting the distribution of Vibrio spp. in the Chesapeake Bay: a Vibrio cholerae case study.
    Constantin de Magny G; Long W; Brown CW; Hood RR; Huq A; Murtugudde R; Colwell RR
    Ecohealth; 2009 Sep; 6(3):378-89. PubMed ID: 20145974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibiotic resistance trends among
    Morgado ME; Brumfield KD; Chattopadhyay S; Malayil L; Alawode T; Amokeodo I; He X; Huq A; Colwell RR; Sapkota AR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 90(6):e0053924. PubMed ID: 38809043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High Salinity Relaying to Reduce Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in Chesapeake Bay Oysters (Crassostrea virginica).
    Parveen S; Jahncke M; Elmahdi S; Crocker H; Bowers J; White C; Gray S; Morris AC; Brohawn K
    J Food Sci; 2017 Feb; 82(2):484-491. PubMed ID: 28099766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus recovered from recreational and commercial areas of Chesapeake Bay and Maryland Coastal Bays.
    Shaw KS; Rosenberg Goldstein RE; He X; Jacobs JM; Crump BC; Sapkota AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89616. PubMed ID: 24586914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a predictive model for the growth of Vibrio vulnificus in postharvest shellstock oysters.
    DaSilva L; Parveen S; DePaola A; Bowers J; Brohawn K; Tamplin ML
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 78(6):1675-81. PubMed ID: 22247136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Projections of the future occurrence, distribution, and seasonality of three
    Muhling BA; Jacobs J; Stock CA; Gaitan CF; Saba VS
    Geohealth; 2017 Sep; 1(7):278-296. PubMed ID: 32158993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay: Operational
    Davis BJK; Jacobs JM; Zaitchik B; DePaola A; Curriero FC
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Sep; 85(17):. PubMed ID: 31253685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay.
    Wright AC; Hill RT; Johnson JA; Roghman MC; Colwell RR; Morris JG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 62(2):717-24. PubMed ID: 8593075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental Factors Associated with Incidence and Distribution of
    Gangwar M; Usmani M; Jamal Y; Brumfield KD; Huq A; Unnikrishnan A; Colwell RR; Jutla AS
    bioRxiv; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37808627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictability of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay.
    Louis VR; Russek-Cohen E; Choopun N; Rivera IN; Gangle B; Jiang SC; Rubin A; Patz JA; Huq A; Colwell RR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 May; 69(5):2773-85. PubMed ID: 12732548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observed winter warming of the Chesapeake Bay estuary (1949-2002): implications for ecosystem management.
    Preston BL
    Environ Manage; 2004 Jul; 34(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 15156353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High salinity relay as a postharvest processing strategy to reduce vibrio vulnificus levels in Chesapeake Bay oysters (Crassostrea virginica).
    Audemard C; Kator HI; Rhodes MW; Gallivan T; Erskine AJ; Leggett AT; Reece KS
    J Food Prot; 2011 Nov; 74(11):1902-7. PubMed ID: 22054191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High salinity relay as a post-harvest processing method for reducing Vibrio vulnificus levels in oysters (Crassostrea virginica).
    Audemard C; Kator HI; Reece KS
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Aug; 279():70-79. PubMed ID: 29738928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Year round patchiness of Vibrio vulnificus within a temperate Texas bay.
    Franco SL; Swenson GJ; Long RA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 112(3):593-604. PubMed ID: 22212214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.