213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24874650)
1. Buick Lucerne drivers' experiences with rear parking sensors.
Cicchino JB; Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 24874650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of rearview cameras and rear parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes.
Cicchino JB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 28394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-world effects of rear automatic braking and other backing assistance systems.
Cicchino JB
J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():41-47. PubMed ID: 30876519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volvo and Infiniti drivers' experiences with select crash avoidance technologies.
Braitman KA; McCartt AT; Zuby DS; Singer J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 20544571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Backing collisions: a study of drivers' eye and backing behaviour using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems.
Hurwitz DS; Pradhan A; Fisher DL; Knodler MA; Muttart JW; Menon R; Meissner U
Inj Prev; 2010 Apr; 16(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 20363812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers.
Kidd DG; McCartt AT
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Feb; 87():92-101. PubMed ID: 26656150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
Scott JJ; Gray R
Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visibility of children behind 2010-2013 model year passenger vehicles using glances, mirrors, and backup cameras and parking sensors.
Kidd DG; Brethwaite A
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 May; 66():158-67. PubMed ID: 24556585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of a rearview camera and parking sensor system alone and combined for preventing a collision with an unexpected stationary or moving object.
Kidd DG; Hagoski BK; Tucker TG; Chiang DP
Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):689-700. PubMed ID: 25977326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
