105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24875965)
1. Secular changes of spinal canal dimensions in Western Switzerland: a narrowing epidemic?
Schizas C; Schmit A; Schizas A; Becce F; Kulik G; Pierzchała K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):1339-44. PubMed ID: 24875965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antenatal factors in the development of the lumbar vertebral canal: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
Jeffrey JE; Campbell DM; Golden MH; Smith FW; Porter RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1418-23. PubMed ID: 12838100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional changes of cervical and lumbar bony spinal canals in one generation in Western Switzerland: a computed tomography study.
Monier A; Omoumi P; Schizas S; Becce F; Schizas C
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):345-352. PubMed ID: 26814476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the relationship between facet joint angle orientation and lumbar spine canal diameter with respect to the kinematics of the lumbar spinal unit.
Miyazaki M; Morishita Y; Takita C; Yoshiiwa T; Wang JC; Tsumura H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 20068469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of spinal canal dimensions in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic disc herniations.
Dora C; Wälchli B; Elfering A; Gal I; Weishaupt D; Boos N
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spinal canal size and clinical symptoms among persons diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Geisser ME; Haig AJ; Tong HC; Yamakawa KS; Quint DJ; Hoff JT; Miner JA; Phalke VV
Clin J Pain; 2007; 23(9):780-5. PubMed ID: 18075405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining clinically relevant values for developmental spinal stenosis: a large-scale magnetic resonance imaging study.
Cheung JP; Samartzis D; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):1067-76. PubMed ID: 24732859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables.
Mariconda M; Galasso O; Imbimbo L; Lotti G; Milano C
Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 16835739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI study of the lumbar spine in achondroplasia. A morphometric analysis for the evaluation of stenosis of the canal.
Jeong ST; Song HR; Keny SM; Telang SS; Suh SW; Hong SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 16943471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midterm results of prostaglandin E1 treatment in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis accompanied by intermittent claudication.
Nakanishi K; Tanaka M; Misawa H; Takigawa T; Ozaki T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1465-9. PubMed ID: 18520942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.
Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Socioeconomic and physical characteristics of individuals with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Abbas J; Hamoud K; May H; Peled N; Sarig R; Stein D; Alperovitch-Najemson D; Hershkovitz I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):E554-61. PubMed ID: 24477055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic effect on the lumbar spinal canal.
Rothman SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jul; 23(13):1506-7. PubMed ID: 9670408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A case of symptomatic extra-foraminal lumbosacral stenosis ("far-out syndrome") diagnosed by diffusion tensor imaging.
Kitamura M; Eguchi Y; Inoue G; Orita S; Takaso M; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Kuniyoshi K; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Suzuki M; Furuya T; Toyone T; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):E854-7. PubMed ID: 22246537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significant antenatal factors in the development of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Papp T; Porter RW; Craig CE; Aspden RM; Campbell DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Aug; 22(16):1805-10. PubMed ID: 9280015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
