These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24876427)
1. Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control. DeSalvo DJ; Shanmugham S; Ly TT; Wilson DM; Buckingham BA J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 8(5):969-73. PubMed ID: 24876427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting. Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial. Halldorsdottir S; Warchal-Windham ME; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Simmons DA J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the DIDGET blood glucose monitoring system in children, teens, and young adults. Deeb LC; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Schachner HC; Viggiani MT; Wallace J; Bailey T J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 22027310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting. Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems. Pardo S; Simmons DA J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1182-7. PubMed ID: 27118729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator. Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation and labeling comprehension of a new blood glucose monitoring system with integrated information management. List SM; Starks N; Baum J; Greene C; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Schachner HC; Cuddihy R J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 22027308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods. Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine. Zueger T; Schuler V; Stettler C; Diem P; Christ ER Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13631. PubMed ID: 22791566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system. Ji LN; Guo LX; Liu LB Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 54(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 26053011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glucose Sensor Accuracy After Subcutaneous Glucagon Injections Near to Sensor Site. Laugesen C; Schmidt S; Tetzschner R; Nørgaard K; Ranjan AG Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Feb; 22(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 31560217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. Slover RH; Tryggestad JB; DiMeglio LA; Fox LA; Bode BW; Bailey TS; Brazg R; Christiansen MP; Sherr JL; Tsalikian E; Kaiserman KB; Sullivan A; Huang S; Shin J; Lee SW; Kaufman FR Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Sep; 20(9):576-584. PubMed ID: 30063162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users. Bailey TS; Wallace JF; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Yu J; Schachner HC; Simmons DA; Chu A Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Sep; 14(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 22746838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicenter study of the accuracy of the One Touch Ultra home glucose meter in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Research In Children Network (Direcnet) Study Group Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):933-41. PubMed ID: 14709195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies. Laffel L Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system. Harrison B; Leazenby C; Halldorsdottir S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1009-13. PubMed ID: 21880245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]