These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24876432)

  • 41. [Evaluation of GLUCOCARD X-METER glucose monitoring system].
    Kwon MJ; Lee SY
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Feb; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18309250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of a blood glucose monitoring system that recognizes insufficient sample blood volume and allows application of more blood to the same test strip.
    Harrison B; Brown D
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Jan; 17(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31825686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Personalized Week-to-Week Updating Algorithm to Improve Continuous Glucose Monitoring Performance.
    Zavitsanou S; Lee JB; Pinsker JE; Church MM; Doyle FJ; Dassau E
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1070-1079. PubMed ID: 29032732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Maltose interference-free test strips for blood glucose testing at point-of-care: a laboratory performance evaluation.
    Ng WY; Tiong CC; Jacob E
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Nov; 12(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 20879959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of training on the performance of blood glucose monitoring using a reagent strip (Glucoprofil).
    Chantelau E; Starostina EG; Antsiferov MB
    Exp Clin Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 96(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 2097164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tighter accuracy standards within point-of-care blood glucose monitoring: how six commonly used systems compare.
    Robinson CS; Sharp P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):547-54. PubMed ID: 22768885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of two brands of test strips for self-monitoring of blood glucose.
    Ho SS; Nakahiro RK; Okamoto MP
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 May; 54(9):1058-62. PubMed ID: 9143654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Issues and implications in the selection of blood glucose monitoring technologies.
    Ervin KR; Kiser EJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11475302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Blood glucose meters employing dynamic electrochemistry are stable against hematocrit interference in a laboratory setting.
    Pfützner A; Musholt PB; Schipper C; Demircik F; Hengesbach C; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1530-7. PubMed ID: 24351179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison between one-point calibration and two-point calibration approaches in a continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.
    Mahmoudi Z; Johansen MD; Christiansen JS; Hejlesen O
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 8(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 24876420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Three new glucose reflectance meters: Diascan, Glucometer II, and Reflolux II.
    Thai AC; Ng WY; Lui KF; Yeo PP
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1989 Jun; 7(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 2752892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Phillips S; Grady M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 30730221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new test strip technology platform for self-monitoring of blood glucose.
    Bernstein R; Parkes JL; Goldy A; Brown D; Harrison B; Chu A; Pflug BK; Simmons DA; Pardo S; Bailey TS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1386-99. PubMed ID: 24124968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Performance of two updated blood glucose monitoring systems: an evaluation following ISO 15197:2013.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Jendrike N; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 May; 32(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 26809001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of the haematocrit value on the determination of glucose levels by reagent-strip methods.
    Barreau PB; Buttery JE
    Med J Aust; 1987 Sep; 147(6):286-8. PubMed ID: 3626945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of ambient temperature on analytical performance of self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Nerhus K; Rustad P; Sandberg S
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Sep; 13(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 21714677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. System accuracy assessments with a blood glucose meter with combined glucose and ß-hydroxybutyrate measurement capabilities.
    Weissenbacher S; Yang CY; Kuan TC; Demircik F; Hanna M; Pfützner A
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 31482753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality of glucose measurement with blood glucose meters at the point-of-care: relevance of interfering factors.
    Heinemann L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Nov; 12(11):847-57. PubMed ID: 20879962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Opportunity Cost and Policy: A Utilization Review of Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Manitoba, Canada.
    Serwylo O; Friesen K; Falk J; Bugden S
    Clin Ther; 2016 Apr; 38(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 26947797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.