These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24876447)
21. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1060-75. PubMed ID: 23063032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197. Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Mende J; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Mar; 13(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 30547683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers. Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Parkin CG J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 23439170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence. Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Beer A; Flacke F; Haug C; Freckmann G Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Patients from Different Departments. Li X; Zheng S; Pan S; Yan T; Di J; Yang Y; Cheng J Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes; 2020 Apr; 128(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 31039600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Alarm characterization for a continuous glucose monitor that replaces traditional blood glucose monitoring. McGarraugh G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 20167167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Review of Blood Glucose Monitor Accuracy. King F; Ahn D; Hsiao V; Porco T; Klonoff DC Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Dec; 20(12):843-856. PubMed ID: 30376362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197? Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Pleus S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28587476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems according to ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 criteria. Chen H; Yao Q; Dong Y; Tang Z; Li R; Cai B; Wang R; Chen Q Prim Care Diabetes; 2019 Jun; 13(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 30770203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product. Setford S; Grady M; Phillips S; Miller L; Mackintosh S; Cameron H; Corrigall K J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28406040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015. Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems. Pardo S; Simmons DA J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1182-7. PubMed ID: 27118729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Postmarket Approval Surveillance of a Low Acquisition Cost Blood Glucose Monitoring System: Assessment of the Accuracy Following ISO 15197:2013. Grant DA; Dunseath GJ; Bain SC; Luzio S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1195-6. PubMed ID: 27179012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Surveillance of the System Accuracy of Two Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose After Market Approval. Jeanny G; Hope P J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):240-1. PubMed ID: 26424240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Control Solutions for Blood Glucose Meters: A Neglected Opportunity for Reliable Measurements? Heinemann L J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 26002834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system. Ji LN; Guo LX; Liu LB Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 54(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 26053011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb; 16(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24205978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of portable blood glucose monitors. Aboezz R; Miller DR J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2005; 45(4):514-6. PubMed ID: 16128508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]