BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24877242)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.
    Gimeno-García AZ; Elwassief A; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sahai AV
    Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 24877242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
    Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.
    Attam R; Arain MA; Bloechl SJ; Trikudanathan G; Munigala S; Bakman Y; Singh M; Wallace T; Henderson JB; Catalano MF; Guda NM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 25733127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: Clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis.
    Matsubayashi H; Matsui T; Yabuuchi Y; Imai K; Tanaka M; Kakushima N; Sasaki K; Ono H
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 22(2):628-40. PubMed ID: 26811612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology results with and without the stylet in 3364 cases.
    Gimeno-García AZ; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sosa AJ; Sahai AV
    Dig Endosc; 2013 May; 25(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 23368962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of small (≤15 mm) solid pancreatic lesions using a 25-gauge needle.
    Crinò SF; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Manfrin E; Parisi A; Amodio A; De Pretis N; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Feb; 17(1):70-74. PubMed ID: 29428108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
    Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
    Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of a Stylet in Endoscopic Ultrasound With Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lai A; Davis-Yadley A; Lipka S; Lalama M; Rabbanifard R; Bromberg D; Nehaul R; Kumar A; Kulkarni P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28644309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
    Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Abdelfatah MM; Grimm IS; Gangarosa LM; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Feb; 87(2):495-500. PubMed ID: 28882575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.