189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24877808)
1. Optimizing mini-ridge filter thickness to reduce proton treatment times in a spot-scanning synchrotron system.
Courneyea L; Beltran C; Tseung HS; Yu J; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061713. PubMed ID: 24877808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of a mini-ridge filter with cyclotron-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
O'Grady F; Janson M; Rao AD; Chawla AK; Stephenson L; Fan J; Wang P
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 36709409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.
Smith A; Gillin M; Bues M; Zhu XR; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Woo S; Lee A; Komaki R; Cox J; Hiramoto K; Akiyama H; Ishida T; Sasaki T; Matsuda K
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4068-83. PubMed ID: 19810479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison of flattened and unflattened beams for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
Hrbacek J; Lang S; Graydon SN; Klöck S; Riesterer O
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031709. PubMed ID: 24593713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy using 4D CT and multiphase CT images for treatment planning of lung cancer: evaluation of the impact on daily dose coverage.
Wang L; Hayes S; Paskalev K; Jin L; Buyyounouski MK; Ma CC; Feigenberg S
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 19111362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study.
Weber DC; Bogner J; Verwey J; Georg D; Dieckmann K; Escudé L; Caro M; Pötter R; Goitein G; Lomax AJ; Miralbell R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 16168832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.
Howard M; Beltran C; Mayo CS; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091703. PubMed ID: 25186378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of beam angle choice on pencil beam scanning breath-hold proton therapy for lung lesions.
Gorgisyan J; Perrin R; Lomax AJ; Persson GF; Josipovic M; Engelholm SA; Weber DC; Munck Af Rosenschold P
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):853-859. PubMed ID: 28464744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy.
Grassberger C; Dowdell S; Sharp G; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2462-9. PubMed ID: 25979039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the validity of density overrides for VMAT lung SBRT planning.
Wiant D; Vanderstraeten C; Maurer J; Pursley J; Terrell J; Sintay BJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081707. PubMed ID: 25086517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal and dynamic ridge filter for pencil beam scanning particle therapy: a novel concept for ultra-fast treatment delivery.
Maradia V; Colizzi I; Meer D; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; Actis O; Psoroulas S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 67(22):. PubMed ID: 36279860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of pencil beam-based homogeneous vs inhomogeneous target dose planning for stereotactic body radiotherapy of peripheral lung tumors through Monte Carlo-based recalculation.
Ohtakara K; Hoshi H
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 25776903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forcing lateral electron disequilibrium to spare lung tissue: a novel technique for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung cancer.
Disher B; Hajdok G; Gaede S; Mulligan M; Battista JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6641-62. PubMed ID: 24018569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing dual-energy x-ray parameters for the ExacTrac clinical stereoscopic imaging system to enhance soft-tissue imaging.
Bowman WA; Robar JL; Sattarivand M
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):823-831. PubMed ID: 28060412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fan-beam intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hill P; Westerly D; Mackie T
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111704. PubMed ID: 24320412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton beam radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy in primary peripheral, early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a comparative dosimetric analysis.
Macdonald OK; Kruse JJ; Miller JM; Garces YI; Brown PD; Miller RC; Foote RL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(3):950-8. PubMed ID: 19801106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
