149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24877818)
21. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bowtie filters for dedicated breast CT: Analysis of bowtie filter material selection.
Kontson K; Jennings RJ
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5270-7. PubMed ID: 26328976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Tube Voltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study on Radiation Dose and Image Quality.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2019 May; 54(5):265-272. PubMed ID: 30562273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The application of automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) on image quality and radiation dose at abdominal computed tomography (CT): A phantom study.
Wang Q; Zhao X; Song J; Guo N; Zhu Y; Liu J; Qi W; Wu J; Liang Y; Feng S; Hu M; Zhou C; Wang X; Hong N
J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 24191984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A phantom study of the performance of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose chest and abdominal CT: When are benefits maximized?
Moloney F; Twomey M; James K; Kavanagh RG; Fama D; O'Neill S; Grey TM; Moore N; Murphy MJ; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 30292504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Moving segments region of interest attenuator for x-ray fluoroscopy.
Sassi SA; Britten AJ
Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9949394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT.
Manduca A; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Khaylova N; Kofler JM; McCollough CM; Fletcher JG
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4911-9. PubMed ID: 19994500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attenuator design for organs at risk in total body irradiation using a translation technique.
Lavallée MC; Aubin S; Chrétien M; Larochelle M; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1663-9. PubMed ID: 18561641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.
Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4525-48. PubMed ID: 25069102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Consistent low-contrast detectability for variable patient sizes and corresponding dose in abdominal CT.
Zhou Y; Nute J; Scott A; Lee C
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):861-872. PubMed ID: 28039857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prototype piecewise-linear dynamic attenuator.
Hsieh SS; Peng MV; May CA; Shunhavanich P; Fleischmann D; Pelc NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(13):4974-88. PubMed ID: 27284705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An optimization algorithm for dose reduction with fluence-modulated proton CT.
Dickmann J; Rit S; Pankuch M; Johnson RP; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1895-1906. PubMed ID: 32040212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improvement of image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage.
Namimoto T; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Shimonobo T; Morita S; Nakaura T; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 22805682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the scatter field for high-energy photon beam attenuators.
Castellanos ME; Rosenwald JC
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Feb; 43(2):277-90. PubMed ID: 9509526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dose reconstruction for real-time patient-specific dose estimation in CT.
De Man B; Wu M; FitzGerald P; Kalra M; Yin Z
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2740-51. PubMed ID: 25979072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT.
Suntharalingam S; Wetter A; Guberina N; Theysohn J; Ringelstein A; Schlosser T; Forsting M; Nassenstein K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4072-4079. PubMed ID: 26943131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Denoising of polychromatic CT images based on their own noise properties.
Kim JH; Chang Y; Ra JB
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2251. PubMed ID: 27147337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images.
Won Kim C; Kim JH
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011901. PubMed ID: 24387509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
