689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24877835)
1. Experimental evaluation and basis function optimization of the spatially variant image-space PSF on the Ingenuity PET/MR scanner.
Kotasidis FA; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062501. PubMed ID: 24877835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Blob-Based Time-of-Flight PET Image Reconstruction in Hybrid Brain PET/MR Imaging.
Leemans EL; Kotasidis F; Wissmeyer M; Garibotto V; Zaidi H
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Oct; 17(5):704-13. PubMed ID: 25634260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full field spatially-variant image-based resolution modelling reconstruction for the HRRT.
Angelis GI; Kotasidis FA; Matthews JC; Markiewicz PJ; Lionheart WR; Reader AJ
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 25596999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.
Wiant D; Gersh JA; Bennett M; Bourland JD
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1169-82. PubMed ID: 20384254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres.
Prenosil GA; Klaeser B; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Berndt M; Krause T; Weitzel T
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5767. PubMed ID: 27782715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isotope specific resolution recovery image reconstruction in high resolution PET imaging.
Kotasidis FA; Angelis GI; Anton-Rodriguez J; Matthews JC; Reader AJ; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052503. PubMed ID: 24784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A GPU-accelerated fully 3D OSEM image reconstruction for a high-resolution small animal PET scanner using dual-ended readout detectors.
Zeng T; Gao J; Gao D; Kuang Z; Sang Z; Wang X; Hu L; Chen Q; Chu X; Liang D; Liu X; Yang Y; Zheng H; Hu Z
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245007. PubMed ID: 32679581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of quantitative, efficient image reconstruction for VersaPET, a compact PET system.
Wei S; Vaska P
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2852-2868. PubMed ID: 32219853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single scan parameterization of space-variant point spread functions in image space via a printed array: the impact for two PET/CT scanners.
Kotasidis FA; Matthews JC; Angelis GI; Noonan PJ; Jackson A; Price P; Lionheart WR; Reader AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2011 May; 56(10):2917-42. PubMed ID: 21490382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET.
Stute S; Comtat C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3849-70. PubMed ID: 23681172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.
Markiewicz PJ; da Costa-Luis C; Dickson J; Barnes A; Krokos G; MacKewn J; Clark T; Wimberley C; MacNaught G; Yaqub MM; Gispert JD; Hutton BF; Marsden P; Hammers A; Reader AJ; Ourselin S; Herholz K; Matthews JC; Barkhof F
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3298-3313. PubMed ID: 35271742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a spatially variant resolution model for small animal brain PET studies.
Miranda A; Bertoglio D; Glorie D; Stroobants S; Staelens S; Verhaeghe J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045001. PubMed ID: 33444262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
