156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24877841)
1. Occupational and patient exposure as well as image quality for full spine examinations with the EOS imaging system.
Damet J; Fournier P; Monnin P; Sans-Merce M; Ceroni D; Zand T; Verdun FR; Baechler S
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):063901. PubMed ID: 24877841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems.
Boissonnat G; Morichau-Beauchant P; Reshef A; Villa C; Désauté P; Simon AC
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1162-1184. PubMed ID: 36069636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology.
Pedersen PH; Petersen AG; Østgaard SE; Tvedebrink T; Eiskjær SP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1313-E1321. PubMed ID: 30383725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cumulative effective dose and cancer risk from repetitive full spine imaging using EOS system: Impact to adolescent patients of different populations.
Law M; Ma WK; Chan E; Lau D; Mui C; Cheung K; Yip L; Lam W
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():1-5. PubMed ID: 29103466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative effective dose and cancer risk for pediatric population in repetitive full spine follow-up imaging: How micro dose is the EOS microdose protocol?
Law M; Ma WK; Lau D; Cheung K; Ip J; Yip L; Lam W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():87-91. PubMed ID: 29571807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CHARACTERISING THE EOS SLOT-SCANNING SYSTEM WITH THE EFFECTIVE DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY.
Clavel AH; Monnin P; Létang JM; Verdun FR; Darbon A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):319-24. PubMed ID: 26538617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body.
Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Organ doses and lifetime attributable risk evaluations for scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients with the EOS imaging system.
Branchini M; Del Vecchio A; Gigliotti CR; Loria A; Zerbi A; Calandrino R
Radiol Med; 2018 Apr; 123(4):305-313. PubMed ID: 29164365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager.
Deschênes S; Charron G; Beaudoin G; Labelle H; Dubois J; Miron MC; Parent S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 20228703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD "John Sevastic Award" Winner in Imaging Research.
Hui SC; Pialasse JP; Wong JY; Lam TP; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Chu WC
Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():46. PubMed ID: 28035336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography.
Dietrich TJ; Pfirrmann CW; Schwab A; Pankalla K; Buck FM
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Jul; 42(7):959-67. PubMed ID: 23536038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of image quality using a X-ray stereotactical whole-body system and a direct flat-panel X-ray device in examinations of the pelvis and knee.
Krug KB; Weber C; Schwabe H; Sinzig NM; Wein B; Müller D; Wegmann K; Peters S; Sendler V; Ewen K; Hellmich M; Maintz D
Rofo; 2014 Jan; 186(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 23999782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Optimization of X-ray conditions for full spine X-ray examinations in slot-scan digital radiography].
Noto K; Minami S; Morishita A; Yokoi T; Iida H; Matsubara K; Takemura A; Koshida K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1438-42. PubMed ID: 22104236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Luska G
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
