BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24878273)

  • 1. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale.
    Takahashi H; Aoki Y; Saito J; Nakajima A; Sonobe M; Akatsu Y; Inoue M; Taniguchi S; Yamada M; Koyama K; Yamamoto K; Shiga Y; Inage K; Orita S; Maki S; Furuya T; Koda M; Yamazaki M; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Mar; 20(1):100. PubMed ID: 30832643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
    Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of New Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) over Conventional Microscopic ULBD.
    Kim HS; Choi SH; Shim DM; Lee IS; Oh YK; Woo YH
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2020 Sep; 12(3):330-336. PubMed ID: 32904063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 13(2):641-650. PubMed ID: 33565271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Park JH; Hyun SJ; Roh SW; Rhim SC
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jul; 154(7):1205-12. PubMed ID: 22653494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ren Y; Nian Y; Sun T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Apr; 25(1):315. PubMed ID: 38654251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Phan K; Mobbs RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E91-E100. PubMed ID: 26555839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Efficacy and Rehabilitation of Microscopic "Over the Top" for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
    Lv B; Sun S; Wang H; Xiao L; Xu T; Ji P; Yuan J; Ding H; Xie J; Meng N; Zhang L; Hu M; Jiang Q; Wang L; Yao X
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7174354. PubMed ID: 33490252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.
    Heo DH; Lee DC; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E9. PubMed ID: 31042664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 79.