These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24878273)

  • 1. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale.
    Takahashi H; Aoki Y; Saito J; Nakajima A; Sonobe M; Akatsu Y; Inoue M; Taniguchi S; Yamada M; Koyama K; Yamamoto K; Shiga Y; Inage K; Orita S; Maki S; Furuya T; Koda M; Yamazaki M; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Mar; 20(1):100. PubMed ID: 30832643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
    Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of New Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) over Conventional Microscopic ULBD.
    Kim HS; Choi SH; Shim DM; Lee IS; Oh YK; Woo YH
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2020 Sep; 12(3):330-336. PubMed ID: 32904063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 13(2):641-650. PubMed ID: 33565271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Park JH; Hyun SJ; Roh SW; Rhim SC
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jul; 154(7):1205-12. PubMed ID: 22653494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ren Y; Nian Y; Sun T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Apr; 25(1):315. PubMed ID: 38654251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Phan K; Mobbs RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E91-E100. PubMed ID: 26555839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Efficacy and Rehabilitation of Microscopic "Over the Top" for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
    Lv B; Sun S; Wang H; Xiao L; Xu T; Ji P; Yuan J; Ding H; Xie J; Meng N; Zhang L; Hu M; Jiang Q; Wang L; Yao X
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7174354. PubMed ID: 33490252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.
    Heo DH; Lee DC; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E9. PubMed ID: 31042664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.