These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24878673)

  • 1. Photoelastic stress analysis in mandibular bone surrounding bar-clip overdenture implants.
    Pigozzo MN; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Souza GF; Ichi AL
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 24878673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
    Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures.
    Kenney R; Richards MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 9813806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics.
    Federick DR; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 8957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution on parallel and angled implants after installation of fixed prostheses.
    Ueda C; Markarian RA; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15273786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants.
    Chiapasco M; Gatti C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 12831726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit.
    Clelland NL; Papazoglou E; Carr AB; Gilat A
    J Prosthodont; 1995 Dec; 4(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 8601182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors.
    Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: a three dimensional finite element analysis.
    Prakash V; D'Souza M; Adhikari R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19336857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.