These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift. Harnsberger JD; Svirsky MA; Kaiser AR; Pisoni DB; Wright R; Meyer TA J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2135-45. PubMed ID: 11386565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing. Arehart KH; Souza PE; Muralimanohar RK; Miller CW J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):190-210. PubMed ID: 20689036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels. Dorman MF; Loizou PC Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 9562538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise. Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects. Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant. Pauka CK J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of acoustically similar and dissimilar vowels in profoundly deaf adults who use hearing aids and/or cochlear implants: some preliminary findings. Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Peterson NR; Rosado CA; Pisoni DB Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 23824440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children. Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural Representation of Concurrent Vowels in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex. Fishman YI; Micheyl C; Steinschneider M eNeuro; 2016; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 27294198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map. Svirsky MA; Silveira A; Neuburger H; Teoh SW; Suárez H Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15224858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users. Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]