236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24879459)
1. Differences in dynamic susceptibility contrast MR perfusion maps generated by different methods implemented in commercial software.
Orsingher L; Piccinini S; Crisi G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):647-54. PubMed ID: 24879459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward fully automated processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI for acute ischemic cerebral stroke.
Kim J; Leira EC; Callison RC; Ludwig B; Moritani T; Magnotta VA; Madsen MT
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 May; 98(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 20060614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in multiple sclerosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 3D at 3T.
Ingrisch M; Sourbron S; Morhard D; Ertl-Wagner B; Kümpfel T; Hohlfeld R; Reiser M; Glaser C
Invest Radiol; 2012 Apr; 47(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 22373532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of quantitative dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI perfusion estimates obtained using different contrast-agent administration schemes at 3T.
Wirestam R; Thilmann O; Knutsson L; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Larsson EM; Ståhlberg F
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e86-91. PubMed ID: 19720489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Software Modeling on the Accuracy of Perfusion MRI in Glioma.
Hu LS; Kelm Z; Korfiatis P; Dueck AC; Elrod C; Ellingson BM; Kaufmann TJ; Eschbacher JM; Karis JP; Smith K; Nakaji P; Brinkman D; Pafundi D; Baxter LC; Erickson BJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Dec; 36(12):2242-9. PubMed ID: 26359151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive assessment of intratumoral vascularity using arterial spin labeling: A comparison to susceptibility-weighted imaging for the differentiation of primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma.
Furtner J; Schöpf V; Preusser M; Asenbaum U; Woitek R; Wöhrer A; Hainfellner JA; Wolfsberger S; Prayer D
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):806-10. PubMed ID: 24613549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging with gradient-echo and spin-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Wong AM; Yan FX; Liu HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 23677620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI of High Grade Brain Gliomas Obtained with Arterial or Venous Waveform Input Function.
Filice S; Crisi G
J Neuroimaging; 2016; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 25923172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between intensity normalization techniques for dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI estimates of cerebral blood volume (CBV) in human gliomas.
Ellingson BM; Zaw T; Cloughesy TF; Naeini KM; Lalezari S; Mong S; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Pope WB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1472-7. PubMed ID: 22281731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced first-pass perfusion MR imaging in patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy.
Li T; Li X; Zhou W; Cui X; Ma L
J Neuroradiol; 2012 Dec; 39(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 22047891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ASL and DSC perfusion methods in the evaluation of response to treatment in patients with a history of treatment for malignant brain tumor.
Bayraktar ES; Duygulu G; Çetinoğlu YK; Gelal MF; Apaydın M; Ellidokuz H
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Mar; 24(1):70. PubMed ID: 38519901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the reproducibility of postprocessing dynamic CT perfusion data.
Fiorella D; Heiserman J; Prenger E; Partovi S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Jan; 25(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 14729537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional and voxel-wise comparisons of blood flow measurements between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in brain tumors.
White CM; Pope WB; Zaw T; Qiao J; Naeini KM; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Wang JJ; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 22672084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perfusion MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging) with different measurement approaches for the evaluation of blood flow and blood volume in human gliomas.
Thomsen H; Steffensen E; Larsson EM
Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22114021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with a prebolus contrast agent administration design for improved absolute quantification of perfusion.
Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Bloch KM; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):996-1006. PubMed ID: 24285621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consistency of normalized cerebral blood volume values in glioblastoma using different leakage correction algorithms on dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging data without and with preload.
Hedderich D; Kluge A; Pyka T; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS; Wiestler B; Preibisch C
J Neuroradiol; 2019 Feb; 46(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29753641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction of B0-distortions in echo-planar-imaging-based perfusion-weighted MRI.
Vardal J; Salo RA; Larsson C; Dale AM; Holland D; Groote IR; Bjørnerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Mar; 39(3):722-8. PubMed ID: 24123663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
