BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24879632)

  • 1. Temporal integration and instrumental conditioned reinforcement.
    Thrailkill EA; Shahan TA
    Learn Behav; 2014 Sep; 42(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 24879632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reinforcer-specificity of appetitive and consummatory behavior of rats after Pavlovian conditioning with food reinforcers.
    Galarce EM; Crombag HS; Holland PC
    Physiol Behav; 2007 May; 91(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17346758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
    Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The basolateral amygdala is critical to the expression of pavlovian and instrumental outcome-specific reinforcer devaluation effects.
    Johnson AW; Gallagher M; Holland PC
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 29(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 19158296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perseverative instrumental and Pavlovian responding to conditioned stimuli in serotonin transporter knockout rats.
    Nonkes LJ; Homberg JR
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2013 Feb; 100():48-55. PubMed ID: 23261854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A conditioned reinforcer did not help to maintain an operant conditioning in the absence of a primary reinforcer in horses.
    Lansade L; Calandreau L
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jan; 146():61-63. PubMed ID: 29158027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquisition of instrumental conditioned reinforcement is resistant to the devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus.
    Parkinson JA; Roberts AC; Everitt BJ; Di Ciano P
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Jan; 58(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 15844375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer: paradoxical effects of the Pavlovian relationship explained.
    Cohen-Hatton SR; Haddon JE; George DN; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23205914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency.
    Mazur GJ; Sanabria F
    Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 21238551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-order conditioning and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition: operational similarities and differences.
    Yin H; Barnet RC; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Oct; 20(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 7964524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contributions of the amygdala central nucleus and ventrolateral periaqueductal grey to freezing and instrumental suppression in Pavlovian fear conditioning.
    McDannald MA
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 211(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 20298722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inactivating the infralimbic but not prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex facilitates the extinction of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in Long-Evans rats.
    Mendoza J; Sanio C; Chaudhri N
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Feb; 118():198-208. PubMed ID: 25543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sucrose concentration and water deprivation on Pavlovian conditioning and responding for conditioned reinforcement.
    Tabbara RI; Maddux JM; Beharry PF; Iannuzzi J; Chaudhri N
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 130(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 26913541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr; 30(2):104-17. PubMed ID: 15078120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elements of a compound elicit little conditioned reinforcement.
    González VV; Seitz BM; Formaker R; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 34843335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pharmacological stressor yohimbine, but not U50,488, increases responding for conditioned reinforcers paired with ethanol or sucrose.
    Tabbara RI; Rahbarnia A; Lê AD; Fletcher PJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Dec; 237(12):3689-3702. PubMed ID: 32840668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using context to resolve temporal ambiguity.
    Molet M; Urcelay GP; Miguez G; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 20141323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excitatory second-order conditioning using a backward first-order conditioned stimulus: A challenge for prediction error reduction.
    Prével A; Rivière V; Darcheville JC; Urcelay GP; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1453-1465. PubMed ID: 30041571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of extinction and an explicitly unpaired treatment on the reinforcing properties of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus.
    Kennedy NGW; Holmes NM; Peng LWT; Frederick Westbrook R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2024 Jan; 207():107879. PubMed ID: 38081536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.