BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24879881)

  • 1. The Role of Gravity in Periorbital and Midfacial Aging.
    Mally P; Czyz CN; Wulc AE
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Aug; 34(6):809-22. PubMed ID: 24879881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gravity in Midfacial Aging: A 3-Dimensional Study.
    Ramesh S; Johnson P; Sarcu D; Wulc AE
    Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jan; 41(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 31974554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in face topography from supine-to-upright position-And soft tissue correction values for craniofacial identification.
    Munn L; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():40-50. PubMed ID: 29852367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of gravity upon some facial signs.
    Flament F; Bazin R; Piot B
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2015 Jun; 37(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 25565330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contemporary thoughts on lower eyelid/midface aging.
    Buchanan DR; Wulc AE
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Jan; 42(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 25440737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three-dimensional facial morphology between upright and supine positions employing three-dimensional scanner from live subjects.
    Bulut O; Jessica Liu CY; Koca F; Wilkinson C
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Jul; 27():32-37. PubMed ID: 28675828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of sitting, standing, and supine body positions on facial soft tissue: detailed 3D analysis.
    Ozsoy U; Sekerci R; Ogut E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 44(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 26116065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age- and gravity-related changes in facial morphology: 3-dimensional analysis of facial morphology in mother-daughter pairs.
    See MS; Roberts C; Nduka C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 66(7):1410-6. PubMed ID: 18571025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of the Aesthetically Desirable Female Midface Position.
    Linkov G; Mally P; Czyz CN; Wulc AE
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(3):231-240. PubMed ID: 29040391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A volumetric analysis of soft-tissue changes in the aging midface using high-resolution MRI: implications for facial rejuvenation.
    Gosain AK; Klein MH; Sudhakar PV; Prost RW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Apr; 115(4):1143-52; discussion 1153-5. PubMed ID: 15793457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The aesthetic unit principle of facial aging.
    Tan SL; Brandt MG; Yeung JC; Doyle PC; Moore CC
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25411772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejuvenation of the periorbital complex with autologous fat transfer: current therapy.
    Ciuci PM; Obagi S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1686-93. PubMed ID: 18634958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volumizing viaducts of the midface: defining the Beut techniques.
    Surek C; Beut J; Stephens R; Lamb J; Jelks G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Feb; 35(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 25717115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positional changes of oropharyngeal structures due to gravity in the upright and supine positions.
    Sutthiprapaporn P; Tanimoto K; Ohtsuka M; Nagasaki T; Iida Y; Katsumata A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 18316503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Long-Term Midface Volume Change After Vertical Vector Deep-Plane Rhytidectomy.
    Jacono AA; Malone MH; Talei B
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Jul; 35(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 26063830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency.
    Lorenc ZP; Bank D; Kane M; Lin X; Smith S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Dec; 130(6):1330-1336. PubMed ID: 23190816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nasolabial fold: a photogrammetric analysis.
    Yousif NJ; Gosain A; Sanger JR; Larson DL; Matloub HS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jan; 93(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 8278486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of frontal facial photographs to assess changes in nasolabial soft tissues.
    Muradin MS; Rosenberg A; van der Bilt A; Stoelinga PJ; Koole R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):728-34. PubMed ID: 17643964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Periorbital Surgery: Forehead, Brow, and Midface.
    Chi JJ
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2016 May; 24(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 27105796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.