These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24879998)

  • 1. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.
    Abernethy AP; Capell WH; Aziz NM; Ritchie C; Prince-Paul M; Bennett RE; Kutner JS
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Dec; 48(6):1211-21. PubMed ID: 24879998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
    Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.
    Koepsell D; Brinkman WP; Pont S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):1033-48. PubMed ID: 24938695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Marshall T; Goldstein CE; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):580-588. PubMed ID: 31818147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application for academic multicenter studies at German ethical review boards].
    Gökbuget N; Naumann R;
    Onkologie; 2013; 36 Suppl 2():29-35. PubMed ID: 23549034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using central IRBs for multicenter clinical trials in the United States.
    Flynn KE; Hahn CL; Kramer JM; Check DK; Dombeck CB; Bang S; Perlmutter J; Khin-Maung-Gyi FA; Weinfurt KP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54999. PubMed ID: 23383026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical issues during the conduct of clinical trials.
    Silverman H
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2007 May; 4(2):180-4; discussion 184. PubMed ID: 17494728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
    Dyck M; Allen G
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients come from populations and populations contain patients. A two-stage scientific and ethics review: The next adaptation for single institutional review boards.
    Knopman D; Alford E; Tate K; Long M; Khachaturian AS
    Alzheimers Dement; 2017 Aug; 13(8):940-946. PubMed ID: 28709585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical and research governance approval across Europe: Experiences from three European palliative care studies.
    Preston N; van Delden JJ; Ingravallo F; Hughes S; Hasselaar J; van der Heide A; Van den Block L; Dunleavy L; Groot M; Csikos A; Payne S
    Palliat Med; 2020 Jun; 34(6):817-821. PubMed ID: 32186242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.
    Sewankambo NK; Kutyabami P
    Infect Dis Poverty; 2022 Sep; 11(1):103. PubMed ID: 36171611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Composition and capacity of Institutional Review Boards, and challenges experienced by members in ethics review processes in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: An exploratory qualitative study.
    Seralegne YZ; Wangamati CK; Bernabe RDLC; Farsides B; Aseffa A; Zewdie M
    Dev World Bioeth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 35247023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process.
    Scherzinger G; Bobbert M
    Account Res; 2017; 24(3):152-176. PubMed ID: 28005408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "I go into crisis when …": ethics of care and moral dilemmas in palliative care.
    De Panfilis L; Di Leo S; Peruselli C; Ghirotto L; Tanzi S
    BMC Palliat Care; 2019 Aug; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 31399094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
    Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
    Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioethics in the Oversight of Clinical Research: Institutional Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards.
    Grady C
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2019; 29(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 31080176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.