496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24880486)
1. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Yee TJ; Terman SW; La Marca F; Park P
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Shen X; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; Zhou X; He S
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Stadler JA; Hu XY; Yan JZ; Li XF; Lee JH; Khoo LT
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2014 Apr; 25(2):279-304. PubMed ID: 24703447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and radiographic outcomes using local bone shavings as autograft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22120378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: incidence and risk factors.
Yuan C; Zhou J; Wang L; Deng Z
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Nov; 23(1):982. PubMed ID: 36376871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
